Abstract:We revisit the recent breakthrough result of Gkatzelis et al. on (single-winner) metric voting, which showed that the optimal distortion of 3 can be achieved by a mechanism called Plurality Matching. The rule picks an arbitrary candidate for whom a certain candidate-specific bipartite graph contains a perfect matching, and thus, it is not neutral (i.e, symmetric with respect to candidates). Subsequently, a much simpler rule called Plurality Veto was shown to achieve distortion 3 as well. This rule only constructs such a matching implicitly but the winner depends on the order that voters are processed, and thus, it is not anonymous (i.e., symmetric with respect to voters). We provide an intuitive interpretation of this matching by generalizing the classical notion of the (proportional) veto core in social choice theory. This interpretation opens up a number of immediate consequences. Previous methods for electing a candidate from the veto core can be interpreted simply as matching algorithms. Different election methods realize different matchings, in turn leading to different sets of candidates as winners. For a broad generalization of the veto core, we show that the generalized veto core is equal to the set of candidates who can emerge as winners under a natural class of matching algorithms reminiscent of Serial Dictatorship. Extending these matching algorithms into continuous time, we obtain a highly practical voting rule with optimal distortion 3, which is also intuitive and easy to explain: Each candidate starts off with public support equal to his plurality score. From time 0 to 1, every voter continuously brings down, at rate 1, the support of her bottom choice among not-yet-eliminated candidates. A candidate is eliminated if he is opposed by a voter after his support reaches 0. On top of being anonymous and neutral, this rule satisfies many other axioms desirable in practice.

A Recursive Measure of Voting Power that Satisfies Reasonable Postulates

The Blocker Postulates for Measures of Voting Power

Axiomatization of some power indices in voting games with abstention

Measuring majority power and veto power of voting rules

Freedom and voting power

The Art and Beauty of Voting Power

Perpetual Voting: The Axiomatic Lens

The Sets of Power

Voting with Limited Information and Many Alternatives

Generalized Veto Core and a Practical Voting Rule with Optimal Metric Distortion

Computing Voting Rules with Elicited Incomplete Votes

Approximation of Banzhaf indices and its application to voting games

Semi-Random Impossibilities of Condorcet Criterion

Proportional Aggregation of Preferences for Sequential Decision Making

Are Weighted Games Sufficiently Good for Binary Voting?

Differentially Private Condorcet Voting

An Efficient and Sybil Attack Resistant Voting Mechanism

Voting in the European Union: The square root system of Penrose and a critical point

Iterative Voting with Partial Preferences

Achieving fully proportional representation: Approximability results