Abstract:The traditional axiomatic approach to voting is motivated by the problem of reconciling differences in subjective preferences. In contrast, a dominant line of work in the theory of voting over the past 15 years has considered a different kind of scenario, also fundamental to voting, in which there is a genuinely "best" outcome that voters would agree on if they only had enough information. This type of scenario has its roots in the classical Condorcet Jury Theorem; it includes cases such as jurors in a criminal trial who all want to reach the correct verdict but disagree in their inferences from the available evidence, or a corporate board of directors who all want to improve the company's revenue, but who have different information that favors different options. This style of voting leads to a natural set of questions: each voter has a {\em private signal} that provides probabilistic information about which option is best, and a central question is whether a simple plurality voting system, which tabulates votes for different options, can cause the group decision to arrive at the correct option. We show that plurality voting is powerful enough to achieve this: there is a way for voters to map their signals into votes for options in such a way that --- with sufficiently many voters --- the correct option receives the greatest number of votes with high probability. We show further, however, that any process for achieving this is inherently expensive in the number of voters it requires: succeeding in identifying the correct option with probability at least $1 - \eta$ requires $\Omega(n^3 \epsilon^{-2} \log \eta^{-1})$ voters, where $n$ is the number of options and $\epsilon$ is a distributional measure of the minimum difference between the options.

Freedom and voting power

The Blocker Postulates for Measures of Voting Power

The Art and Beauty of Voting Power

Measuring majority power and veto power of voting rules

Axiomatization of some power indices in voting games with abstention

Voting with Limited Information and Many Alternatives

Approximation of Banzhaf indices and its application to voting games

Voting power and Qualified Majority Voting with a "no vote" option

The Sets of Power

Power in Liquid Democracy

Statement Voting.

The probability of casting a pivotal vote in an Instant Runoff Voting election

Are Weighted Games Sufficiently Good for Binary Voting?

Constitutional analysis: The power index approach

Non-Borda elections under relaxed IIA conditions

Generating functions for computing power indices efficiently

Measure and collapse of participatory democracy in a two-party system

The complexity of power-index comparison

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

Influence in Weighted Committees

Control Complexity in Bucklin, Fallback, and Plurality Voting: An Experimental Approach