Abstract:Online social networks have emerged as a significant platform for political discourse. In this paper we investigate what affects the level of participation of users in the political discussion. Specifically, are users more likely to be active when they are surrounded by like-minded individuals, or, alternatively, when their environment is heterogeneous, and so their messages might be carried to people with differing views. To answer this question, we analyzed the activity of about 200K Twitter users who expressed explicit support for one of the candidates of the 2012 US presidential election. We quantified the level of political activity (PA) of users by the fraction of political tweets in their posts, and analyzed the relationship between PA and measures of the users' political environment. These measures were designed to assess the likemindedness, e.g., the fraction of users with similar political views, of their virtual and geographic environments. Our results showed that high PA is usually obtained by users in politically balanced virtual environment. This is in line with the disagreement theory of political science that states that a user's PA is invigorated by the disagreement with their peers. Our results also show that users surrounded by politically like-minded virtual peers tend to have low PA. This observation contradicts the echo chamber amplification theory that states that a person tends to be more politically active when surrounded by like-minded people. Finally, we observe that the likemindedness of the geographical environment does not affect PA. We thus conclude that PA of users is independent of the likemindedness of their geographical environment and is correlated with likemindedness of their virtual environment. The exact form of correlation manifests the phenomenon of disagreement and, in a majority of settings, contradicts the echo chamber amplification theory.

Echo Chambers: Voter-to-Voter Communication and Political Competition

Emergence of echo chambers in a noisy adaptive voter model

Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biases

Network Strategies in Election Campaigns

Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship

No Echo in the Chambers of Political Interactions on Reddit

Inside the Echo Chamber: Disentangling network dynamics from polarization

Social Influence and Unfollowing Accelerate the Emergence of Echo Chambers

Loopholes in the Echo Chambers: How the Echo Chamber Metaphor Oversimplifies the Effects of Information Gateways on Opinion Expression

Trends and Topics: Characterizing Echo Chambers' Topological Stability and In-group Attitudes

Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis

Echo Chambers Exist! (But They're Full of Opposing Views)

Opinion formation on dynamic networks: identifying conditions for the emergence of partisan echo chambers

Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks

Disentangling the Echo Chamber: How Exposure to Congruent and Incongruent Opinion Climates on Social Networking Sites Impacts Users’ Processing and Selection of Information

The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign

Competition, Politics, & Social Media

Echo chamber amplification and disagreement effects in the political activity of Twitter users

Me, My Echo Chamber, and I: Introspection on Social Media Polarization

Decoding Echo Chambers: LLM-Powered Simulations Revealing Polarization in Social Networks

Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook