A new spin on optimal portfolios and ecological equilibria

Jerome Garnier-Brun,Michael Benzaquen,Stefano Ciliberti,Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ac21d9

2021-10-20

Abstract:We consider the classical problem of optimal portfolio construction with the constraint that no short position is allowed, or equivalently the valid equilibria of multispecies Lotka-Volterra equations with self-regulation in the special case where the interaction matrix is of unit rank, corresponding to species competing for a common resource. We compute the average number of solutions and show that its logarithm grows as $N^\alpha$, where $N$ is the number of assets or species and $\alpha \leq 2/3$ depends on the interaction matrix distribution. We conjecture that the most likely number of solutions is much smaller and related to the typical sparsity $m(N)$ of the solutions, which we compute explicitly. We also find that the solution landscape is similar to that of spin-glasses, i.e. very different configurations are quasi-degenerate. Correspondingly, "disorder chaos" is also present in our problem. We discuss the consequence of such a property for portfolio construction and ecologies, and question the meaning of rational decisions when there is a very large number "satisficing" solutions.

Disordered Systems and Neural Networks,Populations and Evolution,Portfolio Management

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of how the number and sparsity of solutions in constructing optimal portfolios and ecological balance under constraints (e.g., no short selling allowed) are affected by the distribution of asset volatility or species interactions.

### Main Objectives of the Paper:
1. **Study Optimal Portfolios and Ecological Balance under Non-Negative Constraints**: The paper explores how to construct optimal portfolios under the condition of no short selling and relates this to the problem of ecological balance in species competition models. Such non-negative constraints are reasonable assumptions in both finance and ecology.
2. **Analyze the Number and Sparsity of Solutions**: The study examines how the number of solutions changes with the increase in the number of assets and the sparsity of solutions (i.e., the proportion of non-zero elements) to understand the diversity and complexity of the solutions.
3. **Explore the Properties of the Solution Space**: Through numerical experiments, the paper investigates the degree of overlap and diversity among different configurations, revealing whether these solutions are close to the optimal solution in terms of performance.

### Main Findings:
- The number of solutions grows sub-exponentially with the increase in the number of assets, and this growth depends on the specific distribution of asset volatility or species interactions.
- The typical number of solutions is much smaller than the average number of solutions, indicating the presence of a large number of near-optimal solutions.
- The existence of these near-optimal solutions has significant implications for portfolio management and ecosystem stability, as small changes can lead to different but almost equivalent solutions.

Through these studies, the paper reveals that in complex systems, even with a large number of "satisfactory" solutions, it is challenging to make a uniquely rational choice.