Abstract:In contrast to most conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques, which only allow the spatial distribution of image intensity to be recorded, off‐axis electron holography allows the phase shift of the electron wave that has passed through an electron‐transparent specimen to be measured. The phase shift can, in turn, be used to provide information about local variations in magnetic induction and electrostatic potential within and around the specimen. Recent developments in the technique include the reconstruction of electrostatic potentials and magnetic fields in three dimensions, the use of advanced specimen holders with multiple electrical contacts to study nanoscale working devices, improvements in the stability of transmission electron microscopes to optimise phase sensitivity and the development of new approaches for improving temporal resolution using both direct electron detectors and double exposure electron holography. We are currently using the technique to characterize electrostatic potentials and magnetic fields in a wide variety of nanoparticles, nanostructures and thin films that are subjected to electrical biases and externally applied magnetic fields, as well as to elevated and reduced temperatures. Figure 1 shows representative results obtained from a study of the thermomagnetic behaviour of nanoscale grains of magnetite during heating in situ in the TEM. The magnetic induction maps show first a horseshoe‐like magnetic state and then magnetic phase contours that flow from the bottom to top of the grain at higher temperature. An important limitation of backprojection‐based algorithms for reconstructing magnetic fields in three dimensions is the presence of artefacts resulting from incomplete tilt series of phase images and the inability to include additional constraints and known physical laws. Accordingly, one of our aims is the development of a robust model‐based approach that can be used to reconstruct the three‐dimensional magnetization distribution in a specimen from phase images recorded as a function of specimen tilt angle using off‐axis electron holography. In order to perform each reconstruction, we generate simulated magnetic induction maps by projecting best guesses for the three‐dimensional magnetization distribution in the specimen onto two‐dimensional Cartesian grids. Our simulations make use of known analytical solutions for the phase shifts of simple geometrical objects, with numerical discretization performed in real space to avoid artefacts generated by discretization in Fourier space, without a significant increase in computation time (Figs 2 and 3). Our forward simulation approach is used within an iterative model‐based algorithm to solve the inverse problem of reconstructing the three‐dimensional magnetization distribution in the specimen from tilt series of two‐dimensional phase images recorded about two independent tilt axes. Results will be presented from studies of magnetite nanocrystals, lithographically patterned magnetic elements and magnetic skyrmions examined as a function of temperature and applied magnetic field. At the same time, we are developing a similar algorithm for the reconstruction of three‐dimensional charge density distributions in materials. Preliminary results will be presented from studies of charge distributions in electrically biased needle‐shaped specimens, which require the analysis of differences between phase images recorded using two applied voltages, in order to subtract the mean inner potential to the phase shift. The above studies are part of a wider program of research aimed at recording off‐axis electron holograms of nanoscale materials and devices in the presence of multiple external stimuli. Further examples will be presented from studies of electrically biased resistive switching devices and two‐dimensional flakes of transition metal dichalcogenides, whose electrical properties can be influenced strongly by the presence of contamination and defects, as well as by their interfaces to metal contacts. We are grateful to J. Ungermann, M. Riese, G. Pozzi, W. Williams, A. R. Muxworthy, M. Farle, M. Beleggia, T. F. Kelly and N. Kiselev for valuable contributions to this work and to the European Research Council for an Advanced Grant.

Maskless off-axis X-ray Holography

High-axial-resolution Speckle-Free Holographic Reconstruction Via Cylindrical Quadratic Phase Method and Temporal Focusing.

X-ray Fourier transform holography with beam shaping optical elements

High-Resolution Hard X-ray Holography by Unconfined Atomic Layer Deposited Phase-Shifting 3D References

Structure probing by holographic imaging at nanometer scale with X-ray lasers (SPHINX)

Double-slit holography—a single-shot lensless imaging technique

Limitations and Challenges in Off-Axis Electron Holography of Electromagnetic Fields in Nanoscale Materials

Compact Dual-Wavelength Off-Axis Digital Holography for Quantitative Phase Imaging

On-Demand Subwavelength-Scale Light Sculpting Using Nanometric Holograms

Femtosecond X-ray Fourier holography imaging of free-flying nanoparticles

X-Ray Image Holography

Dual‐beam X‐ray nano‐holotomography

Continuous-wave Off-Axis and In-Line Terahertz Digital Holography with Phase Unwrapping and Phase Autofocusing

X-ray nano-holotomography reconstruction with simultaneous probe retrieval

One-shot common-path phase-shifting holography based on micropolarizer camera and large-shearing Wollaston Prism

Near-Field Scanning Optical Microscope Combined with Digital Holography for Three-Dimensional Electromagnetic Field Reconstruction

Fast non-line-of-sight imaging with high-resolution and wide field of view using synthetic wavelength holography

High-Resolution Digital Holography for Shape Measurement of Microscopic Object

Probing three-dimensional mesoscopic interfacial structures in a single view using multibeam X-ray coherent surface scattering and holography imaging

Grating Based Wide Field-Of-View Digital Lens-Free Holography