Higher-order isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections to nuclear matrix elements of Fermi decays
L. Xayavong and N. A. Smirnova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.109.014317
IF: 3.199
2024-01-17
Physical Review C
Abstract:Within the nuclear shell model, we derive the exact expression for the isospin-symmetry breaking correction to the nuclear matrix element of Fermi β decays. Based on a perturbation expansion in small quantities, such as the deviation of the overlap integral between proton and neutron radial wave functions from unity and of the transition density from its isospin-symmetry value, we demonstrate that δC can be obtained as a sum of six terms. These terms comprise two leading order (LO) terms, two next-to-leading order (NLO) terms, one next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) term, and one next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order (NNNLO) term. While the first two terms have been considered in a series of shell-model calculations [J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, Phys. Rev. C 102 , 045501 (2020), and references therein], the remaining four terms have been neglected. A numerical calculation has been carried out for 24 superallowed 0+→0+ transitions (18 isotriplets and six isoquintets) and three non- 0+→0+ transitions, across the p to pf shells. For most 0+→0+ transitions, the higher-order contribution is of the order 10−3% or smaller, well below the typical theoretical errors quantified within the shell model with Woods-Saxon radial wave functions given in the reference cited above. However, for specific cases such as Br70 and Rb74 , where weakly bound effect dominates, it increases considerably, becoming comparable to or even exceeding the errors in the isospin mixing component of the LO terms. In the cases of Mg20 and Fe48 , as well as in non- 0+→0+ transitions, the higher-order contribution becomes more substantial. Notably, it reaches as large as −4.460% in Cl31 and −2.027% in Cl32 , due to the concurrent effect of the weakly bound and strong isospin mixing in their daughter nuclei. In contrast, for P26 , the NLO terms, despite their substantial magnitude, effectively cancel each other out due to their opposite signs. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.014317 ©2024 American Physical Society
physics, nuclear