Abstract:Background: Iterative reconstruction (IR) has increasingly replaced traditional reconstruction methods in computed tomography (CT). The next paradigm shift in image reconstruction is likely to come from artificial intelligence, with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) solutions already entering the clinic. An enduring disadvantage to IR has been a change in noise texture, which can affect diagnostic confidence. DLR has demonstrated the potential to overcome this issue and has recently become available for dual-energy CT. Purpose: To evaluate the spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a commercially available DLR algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen and compare it to single-energy (SE) CT. Methods: An oval 25 cm x 35 cm custom-made phantom was scanned on a GE Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) at two dose levels (13 and 5 mGy) and two iodine concentrations (8 and 2 mg/mL), using three typical abdominal scan protocols: dual-energy (DE), SE 80 kV (SE-80 kV) and SE 120 kV (SE-120 kV). Reconstructions were performed with three strengths of IR (ASiR-V: AR0%, AR50%, AR100%) and three strengths of DLR (TrueFidelity: low, medium, high). The DE acquisitions were reconstructed as mono-energetic images between 40 and 80 keV. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were determined for the reconstructions following the recommendations of AAPM Task Group 233. Results: Noise magnitude reductions (relative to AR0%) for the SE protocols were on average (-29%, -21%) for (AR50%, TF-M), while for DE-70 keV were (-28%, -43%). There was less reduction in mean frequency (fav ) for DLR than for IR, with similar results for SE and DE imaging. There was, however, a substantial change in the NPS shape when using DE with DLR, quantifiable by a marked reduction in the peak frequency (fpeak ) that was absent in SE mode. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) exhibited slight to moderate shifts towards lower spatial frequencies at the lower dose (<12% in fav ). Spatial resolution was consistently superior for DLR compared to IR for SE but not for DE. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) showed decreased resolution with reduced dose and iodine concentration, with less decrease for DLR compared to IR. DLR displayed a higher d' than IR. The effect of energy was large: d' increased with lower keV, and SE-80 kV had higher d' than SE-120 kV. Using DE with DLR could provide higher d' than SE-80 kV at the higher dose but not at lower dose. Conclusions: DE imaging with DLR maintained spatial resolution and reduced noise magnitude while displaying less change in noise texture than IR. The d' was also higher with DLR than IR, suggesting superiority in detectability of iodinated contrast. Despite these trends being consistent with those previously established for SE imaging, there were some noteworthy differences. For DE imaging there was no improvement in resolution compared to IR and a change in noise texture. DE imaging with low keV and DLR had superior detectability to SE DLR at the high dose but was not better than SE-80 kV at low dose.

[Quantitative Analysis of Emphysema in Ultra-high-resolution CT by Using Deep Learning Reconstruction: Comparison with Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction].

Classification and Quantification of Emphysema Using a Multi-Scale Residual Network

The impact of deep learning reconstruction algorithm on quantitative analysis and image quality of lung CT images

Deep-Learning Reconstruction of High-Resolution CT Improves Interobserver Agreement for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Fibrosis

Classification Of Pulmonary Emphysema In Ct Images Based On Multi-Scale Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Multi-scale Residual Network with Two Channels of Raw CT Image and Its Differential Excitation Component for Emphysema Classification

Deep learning reconstruction for zero echo time lung magnetic resonance imaging: impact on image quality and lesion detection

The image quality of deep-learning image reconstruction of chest CT images on a mediastinal window setting

The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images

Deep Learning Versus Iterative Reconstruction for CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Setting: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose

Spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a deep learning reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen

Prospective evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction for Lung-RADS and automatic nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose chest CT

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm With Lung Enhancement Filter for Chest CT: Effect on Image Quality and Ground Glass Nodule Sharpness

Optimization of pulmonary emphysema quantification on CT scans of COPD patients using hybrid iterative and post processing techniques: correlation with pulmonary function tests

The impact of deep learning reconstruction on image quality and coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve values

The Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Quantitative Analysis of Pulmonary CT

Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study

A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results

Computed Tomography Effective Dose and Image Quality in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Intensive Care Patients Compared to Iterative Algorithms

Application of deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for enhanced CT scan of upper abdomen under different radiation doses: focus on noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen