The impact of deep learning reconstruction algorithm on quantitative analysis and image quality of lung CT images

张卓璐,陈菁,刘卓,陈雷,洪楠
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2023.04.011
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective:This study was aimed to investigate the impact of deep learning image reconstruction(DLIR) algorithm on quantitative analysis and image quality of pulmonary CT by comparing with filtered back projection(FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction veo(ASIR-V).Methods:Non-contrastimages of 46 subjects who underwent lung CT screeningwere collected retrospectively and reconstructed using FBP,ASIR-V with 50% and 100% hybrid iterative reconstruction blending weights(BW),and different levels(low, medium and high) of deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm(named DLIR-L,DLIR-M and DLIR-H,respectively).Quantitative parameters were compared including average CT values and volumes of solid(VS) and non-solid areas(VNS) of each nodule, lung volume(LV),emphysema index(EI),and luminal area(LA),airway diameter(AD),wall area(WA) and wall thickness(WT) of the right upper lobular apical segment, CT value and its standard deviation(SD,represented as image noise) of the descending aorta and CT value and its SD of the air inside the trachea at the level 1cm above the tracheal bifurcation.Image quality and noise in different reconstruction algorithms were evaluated by two radiologists using a 5-point scale(1:very poor; 2:poor; 3:qualified; 4:good; 5:excellent) and compared statistically.Results:Compared with FBP,the image noise was significantly reducedby using different level DLIR algorithms and ASIR-V algorithms with 50% and 100% BW(all P<0.001).Compared with FBP,the image noise was significantly reduced by using 50%-ASIR-V,DLIR-L and DLIR-M algorithms, DLIR-H algorithms(P<0.001).Different algorithms had a significant effect on emphysema index(P<0.001).There were no significant differences in total lung volume, airway area, airway wall area, average airway wall thickness, airway diameter, CT values of air and descending aorta, and nodule volume(VS and VNS) among different reconstructions(all P>0.05).DLIR-H algorithm had higher subjective evaluating score of image quality than that of the other algorithms(all P<0.05).And the subjective score of image noise of DLIR-H algorithm was higher than that of FBP,50%-ASIR-V,DLIR-L and DLIR-H algorithms(all P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with FBP,DLIR and ASIR-V algorithm could reduce the image noise and improve the image quality without affecting the quantitative results of the pulmonary structures and lung nodules.Compared with ASIR-V,DLIR-H algorithm can significantly reduce the image noise and improve the image quality for clinical diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?