Abstract:Purpose: Using an optical sensor, to automatically evaluate the marginal seal of restorations placed with 21 adhesive systems of all four adhesive categories in cylindrical cavities of bovine dentin applying different outcome variables, and to evaluate their discriminatory power. Materials and methods: Twenty-one adhesive systems were evaluated: three 3-step etch-and-rinse systems, three 2-step etch-and-rinse systems, five 2-step self-etching systems, and ten 1-step self-etching systems. All adhesives were applied in cylindrical cavities in bovine dentin together with Tetric Ceram (n=8). In the control group, no adhesive system was used. After 24 h of storage in water at 37 degrees C, the surface was polished with 4000-grit SiC paper, and epoxy resin replicas were produced. An optical sensor (FRT MicroProf) created 100 profiles of the restoration margin, and an algorithm detected gaps and calculated their depths and widths. The following evaluation criteria were used: percentage of specimens without gaps, the percentage of gap-free profiles in relation to all profiles per specimen, mean gap width, mean gap depth, largest gap, modified marginal integrity index MI. The statistical analysis was carried out on log-transformed data for all variables with ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. The correlation between the variables was tested with regression analysis, and the pooled data accordingto the four adhesive categories were compared by applying the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test (p < 0.05). Results: For all the variables that characterized the marginal adaptation, there was a great variation from material to material. In general, the etch-and-rinse adhesive systems demonstrated the best marginal adaptation, followed by the 2-step self-etching and the 1-step self-etching adhesives; the latter showed the highest variability in test results between materials and within the same material. The only exception to this rule was Xeno IV, which showed a marginal adaptation that was comparable to that of the best 3-step etch-and-rinse systems. Except for the variables "largest gap" and "mean gap depth", all the other variables had a similar ability to discriminate between materials. Pooled data according to the four adhesive categories revealed statistically significant differences between the one-step self-etching systems and the other three systems as well as between two-step self-etching and three-step etch-and-rinse systems. Conclusions: With one exception, the one-step self-etching systems yielded the poorest marginal adaptation results and the highest variability between materials and within the same material. Except for the variable "largest gap", the percentage of continuous margin, mean gap width, mean gap depth, and the marginal integrity index MI were closely related to one another and showed--with the exception of "mean gap depth"--similar discriminatory power.

Analysis and discrimination of electrical tapes: Part I. Adhesives

Analysis of adhesives of electrical tapes by ATR-FTIR

Discrimination of electrical tapes using ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics

Analysis and discrimination of adhesive species using ATR-FTIR combined with Raman, and HS-GC-IMS together with multivariate statistical analysis

The application of isotope ratio mass spectrometry for discrimination and comparison of adhesive tapes.

Chemical Fingerprinting of Adhesive Tapes by GCMS Detection of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Products

The use of ethyl cellulose film lifts to collect particle traces from exposed adhesive on the edges of duct tape

A Comparative Study of Epoxy Resin Cured with a Linear Diamine and a Branched Polyamine

Forensic utility of carbon isotope ratio variations in PVC tape backings

Classification of OPP adhesive tapes according to MALDI mass spectra of adhesives

Automated margin analysis of contemporary adhesive systems in vitro: evaluation of discriminatory variables

Rapid and non‐destructive approach for characterization and differentiation of sealing wax using ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy

Determining storage for pressure-sensitive tape evidence: A long-term study

The Pabst's method: an effective and low-budget tool for the forensic comparison of opaque thermoplastics--part 1: Additional discrimination of black electrical tapes

Detectable Adhesives: Nondestructive Detection of Adhesion

Comparison of Medical Tape Performance Using Skin Response Quantitative Measurements on Healthy Volunteers

Data Analysis on Adhesive Property Testing Methods of Hot-melt Pressure-sensitive Adhesive with Styrene Thermoplastic Elastomer

Discrimination and analytical profiling of colored printed documents using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy coupled with explorative and predictive statistical analysis: Part I

Multivariate Analysis of Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR FT-IR) Spectroscopic Data to Confirm Phase Partitioning in Methacrylate-Based Dentin Adhesive

Physical evidence in drug intelligence, Part 2: discrimination of packaging tapes by colour

Study on application properties of allyl-bisphenol A-epoxy resin/episulfide resin