P227. Are two enough? Assessing minimum pelvic fixation points in adult spinal deformity patients with elevated frailty status or severe radiographic deformity requiring complex operative correction

Peter Gust Passias,Peter Tretiakov,Ankita Das,Oluwatobi Onafowokan,Jamshaid Mir,Pawel P Jankowski,Renaud Lafage,Jordan Lebovic,Virginie Lafage,Christopher I. Shaffrey,Andrew J. Schoenfeld
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.350
IF: 4.297
2024-08-20
The Spine Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT The number of pelvic fixation points required in the context of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has become a topic of intense debate, as increasing the number of fixation points potential for infection, prolongued recovery, and delay of allevation of pain. However, for patients with elevated frailty status or severe coronal or saggital radiographic deformity requiring advanced correction, it remains unclear if singular bilateral pelvic fixation is sufficient in reducing the risk of peri- or postoperative complications such as mechanical failure or maintainance of adequate radiographic deformity correction. PURPOSE To assess if a minimum of two pelvic fixation points is necessary to achieving sustained radiographic improvement and reduction of complications in ASD patients with elevated frailty or severe coronal or saggital deformity. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective, single-center. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 860 ASD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES Radiographics, complications, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQLs) measures. METHODS ASD patients with severe coronal or sagittal deformity (PI-LL≥25°, T1PA≥30°, SVA≥15cm, Cobb≥50°, or requiring L4-S1 three-column osteotomy (3CO)) ≥18 years old with baseline (BL) radiographic data at baseline (BL) and 2-years (2Y) were isolated. Univariate and multivariate analysis determined outcomes based upon usage of singular bilateral (sPF) vs multiple bilateral (mPF) pelvic fixation (≥ 3 S2AI or iliac screws). Assessments of outcomes based on number of pelvic fixation points were further assessed upon stratification by frailty status as Severely Frail (SF) or not (nSF) per the Passias et al. modified ASD frailty index (mASD-FI). Backstep conditional logistic regression controlling for age, gender, BMI, and levels fused was utilized to assess the risk of instrumentation failure or proximal junctional failure (PJF) by 2Y, as well as meeting MCID by ODI by 2Y. RESULTS A total of 310 ASD patients (61.46±12.82 years, 81% female, 26.91±5.30kg/m 2 were included in the analysis. Of patients with severe coronal or saggital deformity, 21.6% were sPF, while 78.4% were mPF. At baseline, mPF patients were significantly older (p<.001), more likely to be female (p=.004), had higher BMI (p=.010), and more frail (p<.001) compared to sPF patients, though rates of osteoporosis were comparable (p=.443). At baseline, mPF patients also presented with worse ODI (p<.001) and EQ5D metrics (p<.001). Surgically, mPF patients experienced greater operative time (p<.001), EBL (p=.009), levels fused (p=.007), and hospital length of stay (LOS) (p=.016). However, by the 2Y postoperative mark, mPF patients were significantly less likely to experience PJF by 6W (p=.032) or PJK by last follow up (p=.010) when controlling for age, gender, BMI, and levels fused. With regard to BL frailty, multivariate analysis with similar controls revealed that SF patients with mPF were also significantly less likely to experience PJK by 2Y (p<.001). In terms of patient-reported outcomes, multivariate anaylsis revealed mPF patients also reported significantly greater improvement in SRS-22 total score by 6M (p=.012) and 2Y (p=.037), and ODI (p=.049); SF mPF patients also reported significantly greater improvement in ODI by last follow-up versus SF sPF patients (p<.001). Adjusted logistic regression additionally demonstrated that sPF were at significantly higher risk of PJF by 2Y [2.280 (1.117 – 4.654), p=.024) compared to mPF patients, although both cohorts demonstrated comparable chance of reaching MCID in ODI by 2Y (p=.299). CONCLUSIONS In patients with elevated frailty status or severe coronal or sagittal radiographic deformity at presentation, or those requiring complex operative correction such as three-column osteotomy at L4 – S1, a minimum of three iliac fixation points demonstrated significantly decreased risk of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure, as well as improved patient-reported outcomes by 2Y. In such patients requiring extensive deformity correction, the results of this study demonstrate that singular bilateral iliac fixation may not be sufficient in reducing the risk of costly reoperation, detrimental patient-reported outcomes, or radiographic or mechanical failure. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?