Abstract:The scientific literature is a record of the search for truth. Publication of faked data diverts this search. The scientific community has a duty to warn people to ignore an article containing faked data and must try to prevent inadvertent citation of it. The scientific community accomplishes these tasks by publishing a retraction and linking it to the fraudulent article's citation in electronic indexes of the medical literature, such as PubMed. This mechanism is far from perfect, as shown by a case history of scientific fraud perpetrated by Eric Poehlman, PhD. His institution notified 3 journals that they had published tainted articles. Two journals failed to retract. The third journal retracted immediately, but other authors continued to cite the retracted article. Another duty of the scientific community is to verify the integrity of other articles published by the author of a fraudulent article. This task falls to the author's institution and requires coauthors to vouch for their article's integrity by convincing institutional investigators that the suspect author could not have altered the raw scientific data from their study. Two universities are currently investigating Poehlman's published research. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific literature requires governmental institutions that have the authority to investigate and punish guilty scientists and requires that research institutions investigate alleged fraud. It requires journal editors to issue a retraction when they learn that their journal has published a tainted article. It requires research institutions to accept their responsibility to investigate every article published by a scientist who has published even 1 fraudulent article. Finally, it requires authors to take pains to avoid citing retracted articles and to issue a correction when they inadvertently cite a retracted article.

Superconductivity researcher who committed misconduct exits university

Judge dismisses superconductivity physicist's lawsuit against university

Superconductivity scandal: the inside story of deception in a rising star's physics lab

Retraction Note To: Mental Health Status, and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors of Migrant Children in Eastern Coastal China in Comparison to Urban Children: a Cross-Sectional Survey

Why a blockbuster superconductivity claim met a wall of scepticism

Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn't — lessons from a superconductivity lab

Retracted: Gender Differences in Teaching and Research Performance of University Teachers Based on Discrete Data Analysis

New probe finds misconduct by star botanist

Elite researchers in China say they had 'no choice' but to commit misconduct

Retracted: Classification Method of Rock Structure and Rock Mass Quality of Surface Granite: Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in China

Retracted: Level and Drivers of China's Construction Industry Energy Efficiency under Carbon Dioxide Emissions

An accidental discovery of scientific fraud: A reconstruction

Retracted: The Spread, Rise, and Fall of University Students' Interconnected Internet Public Opinion in the Age of Big Data

Research misconduct: definitions, manifestations and extent

Retracted: Research on University Financial Accounting Management System Based on Big Data and Blockchain Data Fusion

Retracted: Influencing Factors of University Core Competence: An Empirical Study Based on the Entropy Weight Gray Relation Model

Retracted: Application of Nanofluid Electrochemistry in Heat Dissipation of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors

Retracted: Design of Moral Education Management System for Higher Vocational Students Based on Multisource Sensing Data Fusion

Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case

Superconductivity case shows the need for zero tolerance of toxic lab culture

A new type of misconduct in the field of the Physical Sciences: the case of the pseudonyms used by I. Ciufolini to anonymously criticize other people's works on arXiv