Abstract:Introduction In the United States, Title IX requires employees of federally funded universities to report any knowledge of university-related nonconsensual sexual experiences (NSEs), whether or not the students involved desire to file a report. Research assessing students' likelihood of reporting sexual violence (SV) to someone at their university under these policies remains sparse; however, extant research indicates students are more likely to report when SV is penetrative, the perpetrator is a professor, and the event is similar to stereotypes of SV but they are less likely to report when alcohol is present or a student is the perpetrator. Alcohol is present in roughly half of all college SV and alcohol is the greatest rape-risk factor for female students. Despite the widespread implementation of MR policies, there is no consensus on how these policies actually impact students' reporting. None of the previous studies on MR have used an experimental design to evaluate the effects of MR on students' likelihood of reporting sexual violence to universities. Objective The current study aimed to fill these gaps by (1) using an experimental design to assess students' likelihood of reporting sexual violence and (2) by evaluating how contextual factors, like perpetrator, violence type and alcohol consumption, impact likelihood of reporting under MR policy Methods 171 female undergraduate students were recruited for the current study. Participants were randomized into two groups: one group was instructed to imagine that their university had MR policies in place while the other was instructed to imagine that university employees were all confidential reporting (CR) sources-- meaning that students could disclose without creating a report. Students read four vignettes alternating perpetrator (professor vs. student) and violence type (penetrative vs. non-penetrative). After each vignette, students indicated their likelihood of reporting if they were the student in the vignette with and without the presence of alcohol. Results Student answers were dichotomized to "would" versus "would not" report and binomial logistic regressions analyzed differences between conditions and vignettes with and without alcohol. Significant differences arose across vignettes, conditions, and alcohol consumption. Conclusions Overall, students who said they would report the SV vignette without alcohol were roughly 4 times more likely to report it with alcohol (p <0.001). Students were significantly more likely to say they would report a professor perpetrating a penetrative assault (PR) over any other vignette; however, perhaps most importantly, students in the MR condition were significantly less likely to do so than students in the CR group (p= 0.032). Students in the MR group were also significantly less likely to report than CR students when alcohol was present (p= 0.004). Despite being most similar to stereotypical SV (e.g., power differential, penetration), students in the MR group reported it significantly less than CR students. As this type of SV is historically most commonly reported, this could have important implications for real-world reporting patterns. MR policy could significantly decrease reporting overall. Disclosure No.

Effect of student vulnerability on perceptions of teacher-student sexual involvement

An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Teacher Attractiveness on Undergraduates' Perceptions of Teacher–Student Sexual Involvement

A Study of Attitudes Toward Teacher-Student Sexual Misconduct Cases Based on Student Age, Student Gender, and Teacher Gender

Severity of Coercive Sexual Harassment in Professor–Student Interaction and Peer Bystander Responses

Student perceptions of campus safety: testing the vulnerability and disorder models

Sexual Violence and Women’s Education: Examining Academic Performance and Persistence

"I Just Really Didn't Know What I Was Walking into": Scary Sexual Experiences in a Campus-Representative Survey of Undergraduate Students

Effect of fear of victimization on hazardous alcohol drinking, tobacco, and marijuana use among university students: A tale of two sexes

Student-to-Teacher Victimization and Its Negative Impact on Teaching Approaches: Applying Propensity Score Matching

Adolescents' perceptions of Student and Teacher/Staff Defending Against Stigma-Based Peer Victimization

Reactions of Boys and Girls to Sexual Abuse and to Sexual Encounters with Peers

"We can't share things with our teachers": Narratives of mistrust and disconnect between South African female learners and their teachers

The Impact of Defendant Gender and Attractiveness on Juror Decision-Making in a Sexual Offense Case

Beauty and the Eye of the Beholder: Gender and Attractiveness Affect Judgments in Teacher Sex Offense Cases

Socioecological Risk and Protective Factors for Sexual Victimization in Post-Secondary Students in Ireland: A Brief Report

Sexual Assault Victimization Among Female Undergraduates During Study Abroad

High School Teacher Bullying and Student Risk Behavior

Risk factors of sexual violence perpetration and victimization among adolescents: A study of Norwegian high school students

(023) The Impact Of Title Ix Mandatory Reporting Policy On Undergraduates' Likelihood Of Reporting Sexual Violence

Sexism, risk perception, and beliefs about sexual consent

The Role of Mandatory Reporting, Perpetrator and Violence Type, and Alcohol Consumption in Undergraduates' Likelihood of Disclosing Sexual Violence