Systematic Review of Prophylactic Plastic Surgery Closure to Prevent Postoperative Wound Complications Following Spine Surgery

Cynthia R. Guo,Krissia M. Rivera Perla,Owen P. Leary,Rahul A. Sastry,Mimi R. Borrelli,David D. Liu,Mihir Khunte,Ziya L. Gokaslan,Paul Y. Liu,Daniel Kwan,Jared S. Fridley,Albert S. Woo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.007

IF: 2.21

2024-01-07

World Neurosurgery

Abstract:Spinal surgeries are increasingly performed in the United States, but complication rates can be unacceptably high at up to 26%. Consequently, plastic surgeons (PS) are sometimes recruited by spine surgeons (SS) for intraoperative assistance with soft tissue closures. An electronic multi-database literature search was systematically conducted to determine whether spinal wound closure performed by PS minimizes postoperative wound healing complications when compared to closure by SS (neurosurgical or orthopedic), with the hypothesis that closures by PS minimizes incidence of complications. All published studies involving patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery with closure by PS or SS at index spine surgery were identified. Filtering by exclusion criteria identified 10 studies, four of which were comparative in nature and included both closures by PS and SS. Of these four, none reported significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the groups. Across all studies, PS were involved in cases with higher baseline risk for wound complications and greater comorbidity burden. Closures by PS were significantly more likely to have had prior chemotherapy in two of the four (50%) studies ( p =0.014, p <0.001) and radiation in three of the four (75%) studies ( p <0.001, p <0.01, p <0.001). In conclusion, closures by PS are frequently performed in higher risk cases, and use of PS in these closures may normalize the risk of wound complications to that of the normal risk cohort, though the overall level of evidence of the published literature is low.

surgery,clinical neurology