Abstract:PURPOSE:To compare the clinical outcomes, complications, and surgical trauma between anterior and posterior approaches for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. STUDY DESIGN:Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for randomized controlled trials or non-randomized controlled trials that compared anterior and posterior surgical approaches for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Exclusion criteria were non-controlled studies, combined anterior and posterior surgery, follow-up <1 year, cervical kyphosis >15°, and cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The main end points included: recovery rate; Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score; reoperation rate; complication rate; blood loss; and operation time. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the mean number of surgical segments. RESULT:A total of eight studies were included in the meta-analysis; none of which were randomized controlled trials. All of the selected studies were of high quality as indicated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In five studies involving 351 patients, the preoperative JOA score was similar between the anterior and posterior groups [P > 0.05, WMD: -0.00 (-0.56, 0.56)]. In four studies involving 268 patients, the postoperative JOA score was higher in the anterior group compared with the posterior group [P < 0.05, WMD: 0.79 (0.16, 1.42)]. For recovery rate, there was significant heterogeneity among the four studies involving 304 patients, hence, only descriptive analysis was performed. In seven studies involving 447 patients, the postoperative complication rate was significant higher in the anterior group compared with the posterior group [P < 0.05, odds ratio: 2.60 (1.63, 4.15)]. Of the 245 patients in the 8 studies who received anterior surgery, 21 (8.57%) received reoperation. Of the 285 patients who received posterior surgery, only 1 (0.3%) received reoperation. The reoperation rate was significantly higher in the anterior group compared with the posterior group (P < 0.001). In the 3 studies involving 236 patients compared subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty/laminectomy, blood loss and operation time were significantly higher in the anterior subtotal corpectomy group compared with the posterior laminoplasty/laminectomy group [P < 0.05, WMD: 150.10 (63.53, 236.66) and P < 0.05, WMD: 59.17 (45.69, 72.66)]. CONCLUSION:The anterior approach was associated with better postoperative neural function than the posterior approach in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. There was no apparent difference in the neural function recovery rate. The complication and reoperation rates were significantly higher in the anterior group compared with the posterior group. The surgical trauma associated with corpectomy was significantly higher than that associated with laminoplasty/laminectomy.

An Update in Complication Rates Associated With Anterior Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? an MRI Study

Prospective Analysis of Incisional Morbidity Associated With Anterior Surgical Approaches to the Lumbar Spine

Early Complications Related to Approach in Cervical Spine Surgery: Single-Center Prospective Study

A systematic review of risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery over the past decade

Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Retrospective analysis of medium-term outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery performed in a tertiary spinal surgical centre

Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.

Analysis of the Frequency of Intraoperative Complications in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF): A Systematic Review

Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study

Complication Trends and Costs of Surgical Management in 11,086 Osteoporotic Patients Receiving Lumbar Fusion.

Comparison of Complication Rates Between Transforaminal Interbody Fusion and Anteroposterior Fusion for One- or Two-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

411 Perioperative Complications and Radiographic Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty: A Review of 105 Cases From a Single Academic Center

Complications of anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

Technical approach, outcomes, and exposure-related complications in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion

A retrospective analysis of perioperative complications of lateral approach lumbar interbody fusion in patients with prior abdominal surgery or a history of colonic inflammatory disease

Comparative Complications Associated With BMP Use In Patients Undergoing ACDF for Degenerative Spinal Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Perioperative Complications of En Bloc Resection and Anterior Column Reconstruction for Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tumors

A Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in 25727 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Deformity

Analysis of Complications in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Osteobiologics Other than Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Systematic Review

Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications