Abstract:Predicting the adaptation of populations to a changing environment is crucial to assess the impact of human activities on biodiversity. Many theoretical studies have tackled this issue by modeling the evolution of quantitative traits subject to stabilizing selection around an optimum phenotype, whose value is shifted continuously through time. In this context, the population fate results from the equilibrium distribution of the trait, relative to the moving optimum. Such a distribution may vary with the shape of selection, the system of reproduction, the number of loci, the mutation kernel or their interactions. Here, we develop a methodology that provides quantitative measures of population maladaptation and potential of survival directly from the entire profile of the phenotypic distribution, without any a priori on its <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://shape.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> investigate two different models of reproduction (asexual and infinitesimal sexual models of inheritance), with general forms of <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://selection.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> particular, we recover that fitness functions such that selection weakens away from the optimum lead to evolutionary tipping points, with an abrupt collapse of the population when the speed of environmental change is too high. Our unified framework furthermore allows highlighting the underlying mechanisms that lead to this phenomenon. More generally, it allows discussing similarities and discrepancies between the two reproduction models, the latter being ultimately explained by different constraints on the evolution of the phenotypic variance. We demonstrate that the mean fitness in the population crucially depends on the shape of the selection function in the sexual infinitesimal model, in contrast with the asexual <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://model.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> the asexual model, we also investigate the effect of the mutation kernel and we show that kernels with higher kurtosis tend to reduce maladaptation and improve fitness, especially in fast changing environments.

Population Models with Phenotypic Diversity and Fluctuating Environment Illustrate Parameter Regimes of Adaptation vs. Extinction

Transitions in optimal adaptive strategies for populations in fluctuating environments

Predicting patterns of long-term adaptation and extinction with population genetics

Evolutionary dynamics of competing phenotype-structured populations in periodically fluctuating environments

Phenotypic heterogeneity in temporally fluctuating environments

Risk of Population Extinction from Periodic and Abrupt Changes of Environment

Regime shifts, extinctions and long transients in models of population dynamics with density-dependent dispersal

Phenotypic switching of populations of cells in a stochastic environment

Navigating Uncertainty: Risk-Averse vs. Risk-Prone Strategies in Populations Facing Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity

Simulating the Effect of Environmental Change on Evolving Populations

Increasing environmental fluctuations can dampen variability of endogenously cycling populations

Collective Fluctuations in models of adaptation

Bet-hedging strategies in expanding populations

Adaptation to a changing environment: what me Normal?

Extinction in agent-based and collective models of bet-hedging

Evolutionary Dynamics with Fluctuating Population Sizes and Strong Mutualism

Phenotypic evolution in stochastic environments: The contribution of frequency‐ and density‐dependent selection

A comparative study between discrete and continuum models for the evolution of competing phenotype-structured cell populations in dynamical environments

Phenotypic diversity and population growth in fluctuating environment: a MBPRE approach

Bet-hedging against demographic fluctuations

Two waves of adaptation: speciation induced by dormancy in a model with changing environment