Abstract:<p>Hypotheses about the mechanisms of community assembly suggest that biotic and abiotic filters constrain species establishment through selection on their functional traits. It is unclear how differences in traits influence the niche dimensions of closely‐related bird species when they co‐exist in spatiotemporally heterogeneous environments. Further, it is necessary to take into account their participation in mixed‐species flocks, social systems that can include both competition and facilitation. For six years, we conducted counts of forest bird species, and took measurements of environmental variables along an elevational gradient in the Nanling Mountains, China. To disentangle different deterministic and historical/stochastic processes between flocking and non‐flocking bird assemblages, we first compared phylogenetic and functional structure, and community‐weighted mean trait values (CWM). We further assessed elevational variations in trait–environment relationships using a combination of RLQ and fourth‐corner analyses. We found that the flocking and non‐flocking bird assemblages were structured by environmental gradients in contrasting ways. The non‐flocking assemblage showed a strong change from over‐dispersed to clustered community structure with increasing elevations, consistent with the strong selective pressures of a harsh environment (i.e. environmental filtering). The non‐flocking assemblage also displayed significant trait–environment relationships in bivariate correlations and multivariate ordination space, including specific morphological and foraging traits that are linked to vegetation characteristics (e.g. short trees at high elevations). By contrast, flocking birds were more resilient to habitat change with elevation, with relatively consistent community membership and showed fewer trait–environment associations. CWM of traits that are known to be associated with species' propensity to join mixed‐species flocks, including small body size and broad habitat specificity, were linked to the flocking assemblage consistently across the elevational gradient. Collectively, our trait‐based analyses provide strong evidence that trait–environment relationships differ between flocking and non‐flocking bird assemblages. Besides serving as bellwethers of changing environments, emergent properties of flock systems may increase the resilience of animal communities undergoing environmental change. Mixed‐species flocks present an ideal model with which to explore co‐occurrence of closely‐related species, because habitat filtering may be buffered, and the patterns observed are therefore the outcomes of species interactions including both competition and facilitation.</p>

Social and spatial drivers of the multitiered structure of zebra finch social networks

Hanging out in the outback: the use of social hotspots by wild zebra finches

Detailed temporal structure of communication networks in groups of songbirds

Constant companions: Wild zebra finch pairs display extreme spatial cohesion

Variation in local population size predicts social network structure in wild songbirds

Interspecific Sociality Alters the Colonization and Extinction Rates of Birds on Subtropical Reservoir Islands.

A New Semi-automated Method for Assessing Avian Acoustic Networks Reveals that Juvenile and Adult Zebra Finches Have Separate Calling Networks

Genetic, Natal, and Spatial Drivers of Social Phenotypes in Wild Great Tits

The Structure of Mixed-Species Bird Flocks, and Their Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance, with Special Reference to East Asia

The role of habitat configuration in shaping social structure: a gap in studies of animal social complexity

A citizen science approach reveals long-term social network structure in an urban parrot, Cacatua galerita

Density-dependent network structuring within and across wild animal systems

Zebra finches increase social behavior in traffic noise: Implications for urban songbirds

Mixed-species bird flocks re-assemble interspecific associations across an elevational gradient

Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy's Zebra

Different types of social links contrastingly shape reproductive wellbeing in a multi-level society of wild songbirds

Spatiotemporal variation in cognitive phenotype, social network position, and distribution of social associations in a food-caching bird

Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of High-Resolution Animal Social Networks: What Can We Learn from Domestic Animals?

Trait–environment relationships differ between mixed‐species flocking and nonflocking bird assemblages

Structural and Cognitive Mechanisms of Group Cohesion in Primates

The effect of social structure on vocal flexibility in monk parakeets