Abstract:Intrinsic delays in sensory feedback can be detrimental for motor control. As a compensation strategy, the brain predicts the sensory consequences of movement via a forward model on the basis of a copy of the motor command. Using these predictions, the brain attenuates somatosensory reafference to facilitate the processing of exafferent information. Theoretically, this predictive attenuation is disrupted by (even minimal) temporal errors between the predicted and actual reafference; however, direct evidence of such disruption is lacking since previous neuroimaging studies contrasted nondelayed reafferent input with exafferent input. Here, we combined psychophysics with functional magnetic resonance imaging to test whether subtle perturbations in the timing of somatosensory reafference disrupt its predictive processing. Twenty-eight participants (14 women) generated touches on their left index finger by tapping a sensor with their right index finger. The touches on the left index finger were delivered close to the time of the two fingers’ contact or with a temporal perturbation ( i.e. , 153 ms delay). We found that such a brief temporal perturbation disrupted the attenuation of the somatosensory reafference at both the perceptual and neural levels, leading to greater somatosensory and cerebellar responses and weaker somatosensory connectivity with the cerebellum, proportional to the perceptual changes. We interpret these effects as the failure of the forward model to predictively attenuate the perturbed somatosensory reafference. Moreover, we observed increased connectivity of the supplementary motor area with the cerebellum during the perturbations, which could indicate the return of the temporal prediction error to the motor centers. Significance statement Our brain receives somatosensory feedback from our movements with a delay. To counteract these delays, motor control theories postulate that the brain predicts the timing of somatosensory consequences of our movements and attenuates sensations received at that time. Thus, a self-generated touch feels weaker than an identical external touch. However, how subtle temporal errors between the predicted and actual somatosensory feedback perturb this predictive attenuation remains unknown. We show that such errors make the otherwise attenuated touch feel stronger, elicit stronger somatosensory responses, weaken cerebellar connectivity with somatosensory areas, and increase this connectivity with motor areas. These findings show that motor and cerebellar areas are fundamental in forming temporal predictions about the sensory consequences of our movements.

Compensating for a sensorimotor delay requires a memory buffer, a state observer, and a predictor

A conversion from slow to fast memory in response to passive motion

Model-Free Robust Optimal Feedback Mechanisms of Biological Motor Control

A Cerebellum-Inspired Learning Approach for Adaptive and Anticipatory Control

Error-independent effect of sensory uncertainty on motor learning when both feedforward and feedback control processes are engaged

Brief temporal perturbations in somatosensory reafference disrupt perceptual and neural attenuation and increase supplementary motor area–cerebellar connectivity

An internal sensory model allows for balance control using muscle spindle exafferent acceleration feedback

A Simplified Cerebellar Model with Priority-based Delayed Eligibility Trace Learning for Motor Control

A bicycle can be balanced by stochastic optimal feedback control but only with accurate speed estimates

Effects of sensorimotor delays and muscle force capacity limits on the performance of feedforward and feedback control in animals of different sizes

Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic explicit strategy in human motor learning

Adaptive Sensor Fault Accommodation for Vehicle Active Suspensions Via Partial Measurement Information

Associative anticipatory learning and control of the cerebellar cortex based on the spike-timing-dependent plasticity of the parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses

Compensating time delays with neural predictions: are predictions sensory or motor?

Robust Control in Human Reaching Movements: A Model-Free Strategy to Compensate for Unpredictable Disturbances

Limb-related sensory prediction errors and task-related performance errors facilitate human sensorimotor learning through separate mechanisms

Motor compensations, not sensory errors, regulate serial dependence in naturalistic speech production

Self-configuring feedback loops for sensorimotor control

Visuomotor memory is not bound to visual motion

Use of an artificial neuroadaptive robot model to describe adaptive and learning motor mechanisms in the central nervous system

Sensorimotor Time Delay Estimation by EMG Signal Processing in People Living with Spinal Cord Injury