The impact of psychological treatment on catastrophization and pharmacological response in chronic migraine: A single-center experience

Federica Nicoletta Sepe,Claudia Lanni,Giacomo Lancia,Daniele De Michelis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.08.24315876
2024-11-08
Abstract:Background: We aimed to assess the impact of pain catastrophizing, measured using the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), on the clinical response of patients with chronic migraine to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies combined with a multidisciplinary approach, including psychological treatment. Methods: Twenty-five outpatients from the SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo headache clinic were randomly assigned to receive Galcanezumab, Erenumab, or Fremanezumab. Their clinical response was evaluated over six months using several measures, including the reduction in the number of migraine days per month and quality of life assessments via the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment Score questionnaire (MIDAS), and Beck Inventory Scale (BDI-II) for comorbid depression. Results: We established a strong correlation between HIT-6 and PCS, with coefficients of 0.81 and 0.88 at T1 and T2, respectively. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between PCS and other scales, such as MIDAS, nor with any pharmacological therapies. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, including psychological follow-up, for a specific clinical phenotype of chronic migraine patients prone to catastrophizing. However, further data are needed to support these findings.
Neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?