From a genomic risk model to clinical trial implementation in a learning health system: the ProGRESS Study

Jason L Vassy,Anna M Dornisch,Roshan Karunamuni,Michael Gatzen,Christopher J Kachulis,Niall J Lennon,Charles A Brunette,Morgan E Danowski,Richard L Hauger,Isla P Garraway,Adam S Kibel,Kyung Min Lee,Julie A Lynch,Kara N Maxwell,Brent S Rose,Craig C Teerlink,George J Xu,Sean E Hofherr,Katherine A Lafferty,Katie Larkin,Edyta Malolepsza,Candace J Patterson,Diana M Toledo,Jenny L Donovan,Freddie Hamdy,Richard M Martin,David E Neal,Emma L Turner,Ole A Andreassen,Anders M Dale,Ian G Mills,Jyotsna Batra,Judith Clements,Olivier Cussenot,Cezary Cybulski,Rosalind A Eeles,Jay H Fowke,Eli Marie Grindedal,Robert J Hamilton,Jasmine Lim,Yong-Jie Lu,Robert J MacInnis,Christiane Maier,Lorelei A Mucci,Luc Multigner,Susan L Neuhausen,Sune F Nielsen,Marie-Élise Parent,Jong Y Park,Gyorgy Petrovics,Anna Plym,Azad Razack,Barry S Rosenstein,Johanna Schleutker,Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen,Ruth C Travis,Ana Vega,Catharine ML West,Fredrik Wiklund,Wei Zheng,Profile Steering Committee,IMPACT Study Steering Committee and Collaborators,PRACTICAL Consortium,Million Veteran Program,Tyler M Seibert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.03.24316516
2024-11-04
Abstract:Background: As healthcare moves from a one-size-fits-all approach towards precision care, individual risk prediction is an important step in disease prevention and early detection. Biobank-linked healthcare systems can generate knowledge about genomic risk and test the impact of implementing that knowledge in care. Risk-stratified prostate cancer screening is one clinical application that might benefit from such an approach. Methods: We developed a clinical translation pipeline for genomics-informed prostate cancer screening in a national healthcare system. We used data from 585,418 male participants of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Million Veteran Program (MVP), among whom 101,920 self-identify as Black/African-American, to develop and validate the Prostate CAncer integrated Risk Evaluation (P-CARE) model, a prostate cancer risk prediction model based on a polygenic score, family history, and genetic principal components. The model was externally validated in data from 18,457 PRACTICAL Consortium participants. A novel blended genome-exome (BGE) platform was used to develop a clinical laboratory assay for both the P-CARE model and rare variants in prostate cancer-associated genes, including additional validation in 74,331 samples from the All of Us Research Program. Results: In overall and ancestry-stratified analyses, the polygenic score of 601 variants was associated with any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer in MVP and PRACTICAL. Values of the P-CARE model at ≥80th percentile in the multiancestry cohort overall were associated with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.75 (95% CI 2.66-2.84), 2.78 (95% CI 2.54-2.99), and 2.59 (95% CI 2.22-2.97) for any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer in MVP, respectively, compared to the median. When high- and low-risk groups were defined as P-CARE HR>1.5 and HR<0.75 for metastatic prostate cancer, the 220,062 (37.6%) high-risk vs.146,826 (25.1%) low-risk participants in MVP had a 47.9% vs. 14.1%, 9.3% vs. 2.0%, and 3.6% vs. 0.8% cumulative cause-specific incidence of any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer by age 90, respectively. The clinical assay and reports are now being implemented in a clinical trial of precision prostate cancer screening in the VA healthcare system (Clinicaltrials.gov ). Conclusions: A model consisting of a polygenic score, family history, and genetic principal components describes a clinically important gradient of prostate cancer risk in a diverse patient population and demonstrates the potential of learning health systems to implement and evaluate precision health care approaches.
Genetic and Genomic Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?