Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Integrating Monogenic, Polygenic, and Epidemiologic Risk

Sarah S Kalia,Nicholas J Boddicker,Siddhartha Yadav,Hongyan Huang,Jie Na,Chunling Hu,Christine B Ambrosone,Song Yao,Christopher A Haiman,Fei Chen,Esther M John,Allison W Kurian,Boya Guo,Sara Lindstrӧm,Paul Auer,James V Lacey Jr,Susan L Neuhausen,Maria Elena Martinez,Dale P Sandler,Katie M O'Brien,Jack A Taylor,Lauren R Teras,James M Hodge,Adriana Lori,Clara Bodelon,Amy Trentham-Dietz,Elizabeth S Burnside,Celine M Vachon,Stacey J Winham,David E Goldgar,Susan M Domchek,Katherine L Nathanson,Jeffrey N Weitzel,Fergus J Couch,Peter Kraft
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0594
2024-11-01
Abstract:Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive, and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?