Abstract:Approximately 30–60% of people suffer from olfactory dysfunction (OD) such as hyposmia or anosmia after being diagnosed with COVID-19; 15–20% of these cases last beyond resolution of the acute phase. Previous studies have shown that olfactory training can be beneficial for patients affected by OD caused by viral infections of the upper respiratory tract. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a multisensory olfactory training involving simultaneously tasting and seeing congruent stimuli is more effective than the classical olfactory training. We recruited 68 participants with persistent OD for two months or more after COVID-19 infection; they were divided into three groups. One group received olfactory training which involved smelling four odorants (strawberry, cheese, coffee, lemon; classical olfactory training). The other group received the same olfactory stimuli but presented retronasally (i.e., as droplets on their tongue); while simultaneous and congruent gustatory (i.e., sweet, salty, bitter, sour) and visual (corresponding images) stimuli were presented (multisensory olfactory training). The third group received odorless propylene glycol in four bottles (control group). Training was carried out twice daily for 12 weeks. We assessed olfactory function and olfactory specific quality of life before and after the intervention. Both intervention groups showed a similar significant improvement of olfactory function, although there was no difference in the assessment of quality of life. Both multisensory and classical training can be beneficial for OD following a viral infection; however, only the classical olfactory training paradigm leads to an improvement that was significantly stronger than the control group. Approximately 30–60% of people suffer from olfactory dysfunction (OD) such as hyposmia or anosmia after being diagnosed with COVID-19; 15–20% of these cases last beyond resolution of the acute phase. Previous studies have shown that olfactory training can be beneficial for patients affected by OD caused by viral infections of the upper respiratory tract. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a multisensory olfactory training involving simultaneously tasting and seeing congruent stimuli is more effective than the classical olfactory training. We recruited 68 participants with persistent OD for two months or more after COVID-19 infection; they were divided into three groups. One group received olfactory training which involved smelling four odorants (strawberry, cheese, coffee, lemon; classical olfactory training). The other group received the same olfactory stimuli but presented retronasally (i.e., as droplets on their tongue); while simultaneous and congruent gustatory (i.e., sweet, salty, bitter, sour) and visual (corresponding images) stimuli were presented (multisensory olfactory training). The third group received odorless propylene glycol in four bottles (control group). Training was carried out twice daily for 12 weeks. We assessed olfactory function and olfactory specific quality of life before and after the intervention. Both intervention groups showed a similar significant improvement of olfactory function, although there was no difference in the assessment of quality of life. Both multisensory and classical training can be beneficial for OD following a viral infection; however, only the classical olfactory training paradigm leads to an improvement that was significantly stronger than the control group.

Olfactory Training: Recommendation Frequency Amongst Rhinologists

Patient Experience and Preferences for the Assessment of Olfaction: The Patient International Clinical Assessment of Smell Survey

4347 Bimodal Visual-Olfactory Training for Post-Surgical or Post-Traumatic Olfactory Dysfunction (VOLT Trial)

Olfactory training: perspective from people who were disturbed by their smell problems

Olfactory Training Impacts Olfactory Dysfunction Induced by COVID-19: A Pilot Study

Adherence to olfactory training improves orthonasal and retronasal olfaction in post-COVID-19 olfactory loss

Olfactory dysfunction and training in children with COVID-19 infection: A prospective study Post-COVID pediatric olfactory training

Four odorants for olfactory training are enough: a pilot study

Olfactory training in normosmic individuals: a randomised controlled trial

Steroids and Olfactory Training for Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

Effects of Olfactory Training in Patients With Postinfectious Olfactory Dysfunction

Can Multisensory Olfactory Training Improve Olfactory Dysfunction Caused by COVID-19?

Treatments for Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Age‐related differences in olfactory training outcomes: A prospective cohort study

Effects of Olfactory Training on Posttraumatic Olfactory Dysfunction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Orthonasal and retronasal olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps undergoing endoscopic sinonasal surgery

Olfactory training outcomes in post COVID 19 olfactory dysfunction

Assessing the Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

A Community-Based Study on the Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction

Persistent COVID-19 parosmia and olfactory loss post olfactory training: randomized clinical trial comparing central and peripheral-acting therapeutics

Beyond aroma: A scoping review on the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on retronasal olfaction