Abstract:Approximately 30–60% of people suffer from olfactory dysfunction (OD) such as hyposmia or anosmia after being diagnosed with COVID-19; 15–20% of these cases last beyond resolution of the acute phase. Previous studies have shown that olfactory training can be beneficial for patients affected by OD caused by viral infections of the upper respiratory tract. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a multisensory olfactory training involving simultaneously tasting and seeing congruent stimuli is more effective than the classical olfactory training. We recruited 68 participants with persistent OD for two months or more after COVID-19 infection; they were divided into three groups. One group received olfactory training which involved smelling four odorants (strawberry, cheese, coffee, lemon; classical olfactory training). The other group received the same olfactory stimuli but presented retronasally (i.e., as droplets on their tongue); while simultaneous and congruent gustatory (i.e., sweet, salty, bitter, sour) and visual (corresponding images) stimuli were presented (multisensory olfactory training). The third group received odorless propylene glycol in four bottles (control group). Training was carried out twice daily for 12 weeks. We assessed olfactory function and olfactory specific quality of life before and after the intervention. Both intervention groups showed a similar significant improvement of olfactory function, although there was no difference in the assessment of quality of life. Both multisensory and classical training can be beneficial for OD following a viral infection; however, only the classical olfactory training paradigm leads to an improvement that was significantly stronger than the control group. Approximately 30–60% of people suffer from olfactory dysfunction (OD) such as hyposmia or anosmia after being diagnosed with COVID-19; 15–20% of these cases last beyond resolution of the acute phase. Previous studies have shown that olfactory training can be beneficial for patients affected by OD caused by viral infections of the upper respiratory tract. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a multisensory olfactory training involving simultaneously tasting and seeing congruent stimuli is more effective than the classical olfactory training. We recruited 68 participants with persistent OD for two months or more after COVID-19 infection; they were divided into three groups. One group received olfactory training which involved smelling four odorants (strawberry, cheese, coffee, lemon; classical olfactory training). The other group received the same olfactory stimuli but presented retronasally (i.e., as droplets on their tongue); while simultaneous and congruent gustatory (i.e., sweet, salty, bitter, sour) and visual (corresponding images) stimuli were presented (multisensory olfactory training). The third group received odorless propylene glycol in four bottles (control group). Training was carried out twice daily for 12 weeks. We assessed olfactory function and olfactory specific quality of life before and after the intervention. Both intervention groups showed a similar significant improvement of olfactory function, although there was no difference in the assessment of quality of life. Both multisensory and classical training can be beneficial for OD following a viral infection; however, only the classical olfactory training paradigm leads to an improvement that was significantly stronger than the control group.

Olfactory training outcomes in post COVID 19 olfactory dysfunction

Olfactory dysfunction and training in children with COVID-19 infection: A prospective study Post-COVID pediatric olfactory training

Adherence to olfactory training improves orthonasal and retronasal olfaction in post-COVID-19 olfactory loss

Olfactory Training Impacts Olfactory Dysfunction Induced by COVID-19: A Pilot Study

Clinical Features of Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients

Assessment of olfactory recovery after COVID-19: cross-sectional study

Can Multisensory Olfactory Training Improve Olfactory Dysfunction Caused by COVID-19?

Olfactory recovery following infection with COVID-19: A systematic review

Recovery rates of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction using psychophysical assessment: A longitudinal cohort study

Treatments for Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Effects of Olfactory Training in Patients With Postinfectious Olfactory Dysfunction

Comparative analyses of post-infectious olfactory dysfunction between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases

Efficacy and safety of oral corticosteroids and olfactory training in the management of COVID-19-related loss of smell

Persistent COVID-19 parosmia and olfactory loss post olfactory training: randomized clinical trial comparing central and peripheral-acting therapeutics

Understanding the olfactory role in post-COVID cognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations

Persistent Olfactory and Taste Dysfunction after COVID-19

Clinical factors influencing olfactory performance in patients with persistent COVID-19 smell loss longer than 1 year

Factors Associated With Persisting Olfactory Dysfunction After COVID‐19

Age‐related differences in olfactory training outcomes: A prospective cohort study

A Pilot Study of Short-Course Oral Vitamin A and Aerosolised Diffuser Olfactory Training for the Treatment of Smell Loss in Long COVID

Effectiveness of olfactory training on different severities of posttraumatic loss of smell.