Abstract:Abstract To assess the clinical value of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) combined with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing it with the MT alone. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of both observational and randomized controlled studies (RCTs) to investigate various outcomes. Our search for relevant studies was conducted between January 2011 and June 2022 in four major databases: PubMed, Embase, WOS, and Cochrane Library. We collected data on several outcomes, including functional independence (FI; defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2), excellent outcomes (mRS 0–1), successful recanalization (SR), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), any intracerebral hemorrhage (aICH), and mortality at three months or discharge. The primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome were FI and sICH, respectively, whereas excellent outcomes and SR were considered secondary efficacy outcomes. Additionally, mortality and aICH were analyzed as secondary safety outcomes. We employed the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects model for RCTs when I 2 < 50%, otherwise the random-effects model was utilized. For observational studies and subgroup analyses, we used the random-effects model to minimize potential bias. A total of 55 eligible studies (nine RCTs and 46 observational studies) were included. For RCTs, the MT + IVT group was superior in FI (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11–1.46), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03–1.43), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05–1.45), mortality (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54–0.97) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, the MT + IVT group reduced the risk of mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.88). However, the difference in FI between the MT + IVT group and the MT alone group was not significant (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.99–1.38, Fig. 3a). For observational studies, the results of FI (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16–1.33), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09–1.54), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05–1.44), mortality (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.77) in the MT + IVT group were better. Additionally, the MT + IVT group increased the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) including sICH (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11–1.21) and aICH (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05–1.46) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, significant better outcomes were seen in the MT + IVT group on FI (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.21–1.52), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.26–1.75), and mortality (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.94). The MT + IVT therapy did improve the prognosis for AIS patients and did not increase the risk of HT compared with MT alone therapy.

Evaluating Thrombectomy Devices and Combination Therapies in Acute ischemic Stroke: A systematic review & Network Meta-Analysis of 201 studies

Comparison of Four Food and Drug Administration-Approved Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Various Mechanical Thrombectomy Strategies for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Efficacy and Safety of Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion A Systematic Review

The Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Posterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion as Compared to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion: A Systematic Review

Thrombectomy with or Without Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with a large infarct area: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with distal medium vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endovascular Treatment or General Treatment: How Should Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Choose to Benefit from Them the Most?

Intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy stent retrievers and aspiration devices in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Endovascular Thrombectomy Compared with Best Medical Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Distal Medium Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multinational Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Mechanical Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials

Ncog-18. Meta-Analysis Of Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy Vs Bridging Therapy In The Management Of Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion

First-line thrombectomy strategy for distal and medium vessel occlusions: a systematic review

Outcomes after Thrombectomy for Minor Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Matched-Control Study.