Anxious/depressed individuals exhibit disrupted frontotemporal synchrony during cognitive conflict encoding

Aniruddha Shekara,Alexander Ross,Daniel J Soper,Angelique C Paulk,Sydney S Cash,Paula K Shear,John P Sheehy,Ishita Basu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.10.617540

2024-10-24

Abstract:Anxiety and depressive disorders are associated with cognitive control deficits, yet their underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we used high-resolution stereotactic EEG (sEEG) to determine how anxiety and/or depression modulates neural and behavioral responses when cognitive control is engaged in individuals with medically refractory epilepsy undergoing sEEG monitoring for surgical evaluation. We analyzed sEEG data recorded from frontotemporal regions of 29 participants (age range: 19-55, mean age: 35.5, female: 16/29) while they performed a Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT) designed to elicit cognitive conflict. Neurobehavioral interviews, symptom rating scales, and clinical documentation were used to categorize participants as demonstrating anxiety and/or depression symptoms (A/D, n=13) or as epilepsy controls (EC, n=16). Generalized linear mixed-effects (GLME) models were used to analyze behavioral and neural data. Models of oscillatory power were used to identify brain regions within conflict-encoding networks in which coherence and phase locking values (PLV) were examined in A/D and EC. A/D participants demonstrated a greater conflict effect (response time slowing with higher cognitive load), without impairment in response time (RT) or accuracy compared to EC. A/D participants also showed significantly enhanced conflict-evoked theta (4-8Hz) and alpha (8-15Hz) power in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and amygdala as well as widespread broadband activity in the lateral temporal lobe (LTL) compared to EC. Additionally, theta coherence and PLV between dlPFC-LTL and dlPFC-amygdala were reduced by conflict in A/D. Our findings suggest individuals with anxiety/depression symptoms exhibit heightened frontotemporal oscillatory activity and disrupted frontotemporal synchrony during cognitive conflict encoding, which may indicate a greater need for cognitive resources due to ineffective cognitive processing. These results highlight a potential role of frontotemporal circuits in conflict encoding that are altered in anxiety/depression, and may further inform future therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing cognitive control in these populations.

Neuroscience

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the neural mechanism of anterior temporal lobe synchrony in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders during cognitive conflict encoding. Specifically, researchers hope to use high - resolution stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) to explore how anxiety and/or depression modulate the neural and behavioral responses of individuals when performing cognitive control tasks, especially in those individuals who receive sEEG monitoring to evaluate surgery due to drug - refractory epilepsy.

### Main problems
1. **The influence of anxiety and depression on cognitive control**: Anxiety and depressive disorders are related to cognitive control deficits, but the underlying neural mechanisms are still unclear. Researchers want to determine how anxiety and/or depression affect the neural activity and functional connectivity of the anterior temporal lobe region during cognitive conflict encoding.
2. **Functional changes in the anterior temporal lobe network**: Researchers hope to understand whether anxiety and depressive symptoms will lead to enhanced oscillatory activity and disrupted synchrony in the anterior temporal lobe network when processing cognitive conflict.

### Research methods
- **Participants**: 29 individuals who received sEEG monitoring due to drug - refractory epilepsy, among which 13 showed anxiety and/or depressive symptoms (A/D group), and 16 were epilepsy control group (EC group).
- **Experimental design**: sEEG data were recorded when participants were performing the multi - source interference task (MSIT), which aims to induce cognitive conflict.
- **Data analysis**: Generalized linear mixed - effects models (GLME) were used to analyze behavioral and neural data. Brain regions in the conflict - encoding network were identified through the oscillatory power model, and coherence and phase - locking value (PLV) were examined in the A/D group and EC group respectively.

### Main findings
- **Behavioral differences**: The A/D group showed a greater conflict effect (slower reaction time) under high cognitive load, but the overall reaction time and accuracy were comparable to those of the EC group.
- **Differences in neural activity**: The oscillatory power in the theta (4 - 8 Hz) and alpha (8 - 15 Hz) frequency bands in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), amygdala, and lateral temporal lobe (LTL) was significantly enhanced in the A/D group. In addition, the theta coherence and PLV between dlPFC - LTL and dlPFC - amygdala in the A/D group decreased under conflict conditions.

### Conclusion
The research results show that individuals with anxiety and depressive symptoms show enhanced anterior temporal lobe oscillatory activity and disrupted synchrony during cognitive conflict encoding, which may reflect the inefficiency of these individuals in cognitive processing and the need for more cognitive resources. These findings emphasize the potential role of the anterior temporal lobe circuit in anxiety and depression and provide new targets for future cognitive control treatments for these populations.