Dominant harmonic pattern as an ictal marker of the epileptogenic zone in focal neocortical epilepsy

Lingqi Ye,Lingli Hu,Hongyi Ye,Yihe Chen,Junming Zhu,Zhe Zheng,Hongjie Jiang,Dongping Yang,Cong Chen,Shan Wang,Zhongjin Wang,Wenjie Ming,Yi Wang,Cenglin Xu,Jin Wang,Meiping Ding,Shuang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.25.24314351
2024-09-26
Abstract:Objective: The ictal pattern ( pattern), produced by the non-linear characteristics of EEG waveforms, may hold significant potential for localizing the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in focal epilepsy. However, further validation is needed to establish the pattern′s effectiveness as a biomarker for measuring the EZ. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 131 patients diagnosed with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, all of whom had complete stereo-electroencephalographic (SEEG) data. From this cohort, we selected 85 patients for outcome analysis. We analyzed the morphological and time-frequency (TF) features of the H pattern using TF plots. A third quartile (Q3) threshold was applied to classify channels expressing either dominant ( ) or non-dominant H patterns ( ). We then examined associations between the morphological features of the pattern and patients′ clinical characteristics, as well as the correlations between the extent of channel removal and seizure outcomes. Results: We found no significant correlations between the morphological features of the ictal pattern and clinical factors, including lesional MRI findings, epileptic onset patterns, epilepsy type, pathology, or surgical outcomes. The non-localizable pattern appeared exclusively in patients with non-focal onset patterns. Notably, the proportion of was higher in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) compared to the early propagation zone. The seizure-free group demonstrated significantly higher removal proportions of , both within and outside the SOZ ( = 0.014; = 0.036), with AUCs of 0.606 and 0.660, respectively, in a seizure freedom prediction model. Survival analysis confirmed that complete removal of these regions correlated with long-term seizure freedom ( = 0.008; = 0.028). Further subgroup analysis showed a significant correlation in neocortical epilepsy ( = 0.0004; = 0.011), but not in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Additionally, multivariate analysis identified the complete removal of as the only independent predictor for seizure freedom ( = 0.022; OR 6.035, 95% CI 1.291-28.211). Conclusions: Our study supports the notion that the dominance of the ictal pattern, regardless of its morphology, serves as a novel biomarker for the EZ in focal epilepsy. The non-linearity in EEG waveforms provides new insights into understanding ictal spreading propagation and offers potential improvements for surgical planning in neocortical epilepsy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?