Co-circulating pathogens of humans: A systematic review of mechanistic transmission models

Kelsey Shaw,Jennifer Peterson,Neda Jalali,Saikanth Ratnavale,Manar Alkuzweny,Carly Barbera,Alan Costello,Liam Emerick,Guido Espana,Alexander Meyer,Stacy Mowry,Marya Poterek,Carol de Souza Moreira,Eric Morgan,Sean M Moore,Alex Perkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313749

2024-09-16

Abstract:Historically, most mathematical models of infectious disease dynamics have focused on a single pathogen, despite the ubiquity of co-circulating pathogens in the real world. We conducted a systematic review of 311 published papers that included a mechanistic, population-level model of co-circulating human pathogens. We identified the types of pathogens represented in this literature, techniques used, and motivations for conducting these studies. We also created a complexity index to quantify the degree to which co-circulating pathogen models diverged from single-pathogen models. We found that the emergence of new pathogens, such as HIV and SARS-CoV-2, precipitated modeling activity of the emerging pathogen with established pathogens. Pathogen characteristics also tended to drive modeling activity; for example, HIV suppresses the immune response, eliciting interesting dynamics when it is modeled with other pathogens. The motivations driving these studies were varied but could be divided into two major categories: exploration of dynamics and evaluation of interventions. Finally, we found that model complexity quickly increases as additional pathogens are added. Future potential avenues of research we identified include investigating the effects of misdiagnosis of clinically similar co-circulating pathogens and characterizing the impacts of one pathogen on public health resources available to curtail the spread of other pathogens.

Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of systematically reviewing and analyzing mechanistic transmission models of co-circulating pathogens. Specifically, the main objectives of the paper include:

1. **Identify the most common co-circulating pathogens and their ecological, biological, and clinical similarities**: Most models in the study considered two pathogens (88.4%, 275/311), with the most common combination being HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (25%, 78/311). Additionally, the study found some common features in the transmission patterns of pathogens, such as the combination of sexually transmitted viruses with other pathogens.

2. **Analyze the motivations and research purposes of authors in creating co-circulating models**: The main motivations for creating these models were divided into two categories: first, previous research indicated that one pathogen affects another, but more research was needed (54.7%, 170/311); second, there was a lack of prior modeling studies for specific pathogen combinations (35.1%, 109/311).

3. **Describe common features and output results of co-circulating models**: The study collected information on model structure, parameter settings, etc., through questionnaires and classified the models based on this information.

4. **Quantify the differences between single-pathogen models and co-circulating pathogen models**: A complexity index was designed to assess the degree of difference between each co-circulating pathogen model and single-pathogen models.

5. **Report uncommon aspects in co-circulating model literature and future research directions**: The study explored some uncommon features in co-circulating pathogen models and proposed possible future research directions, such as the impact of misdiagnosing clinically similar co-circulating pathogens and the effect of one pathogen on the availability of public health resources.