Christopher V McCabe,Peter D Price,Gemma F Codner,Alasdair J Allan,Adam Caulder,Skevoulla Christou,Jorik Loeffler,Matthew Mackenzie,Elke Malzer,Joffrey Mianné,Krystian J Nowicki,Edward J O'Neill,Fran J Pike,Marie Hutchison,Benoit Petit-Demoulière,Michelle E Stewart,Hilary Gates,Sara Wells,Nicholas D Sanderson,Lydia Teboul,Christopher V. McCabe,Peter D. Price,Gemma F. Codner,Alasdair J. Allan,Krystian J. Nowicki,Edward J. O'Neill,Fran J. Pike,Michelle E. Stewart,Nicholas D. Sanderson

Abstract:Recent developments in CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing tools have facilitated the introduction of precise alleles, including genetic intervals spanning several kilobases, directly into the embryo. However, the introduction of donor templates, via homology directed repair, can be erroneous or incomplete and these techniques often produce mosaic founder animals. Thus, newly generated alleles must be verified at the sequence level across the targeted locus. Screening for the presence of the desired mutant allele using traditional sequencing methods can be challenging due to the size of the interval to be sequenced, together with the mosaic nature of founders. In order to help disentangle the genetic complexity of these animals, we tested the application of Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing at the targeted locus and found that the achievable depth of sequencing is sufficient to offset the sequencing error rate associated with the technology used to validate targeted regions of interest. We have assembled an analysis workflow that facilitates interrogating the entire length of a targeted segment in a single read, to confirm that the intended mutant sequence is present in both heterozygous animals and mosaic founders. We used this workflow to compare the output of PCR-based and Cas9 capture-based targeted sequencing for validation of edited alleles. Targeted long-read sequencing supports in-depth characterisation of all experimental models that aim to produce knock-in or conditional alleles, including those that contain a mix of genome-edited alleles. PCR- or Cas9 capture-based modalities bring different advantages to the analysis. In this study we investigated the use of long-read sequencing for the analysis of genome editing experiments. We found that Oxford Nanopore Technology sequencing is a superior alternative to Sanger sequencing as it yields a more rapid and comprehensive characterisation of the genotype of both mosaic animals and their progeny. We compared PCR-based and nCATs targeted sequencing modalities and found they have different advantages and applicabilities.

CRISPR-CLEAR: Nucleotide-Resolution Mapping of Regulatory Elements via Allelic Readout of Tiled Base Editing

Coupling CRISPR Scanning with Targeted Chromatin Accessibility Profiling using a Double-Stranded DNA Deaminase

High-resolution characterization of gene function using single-cell CRISPR tiling screen

SpRY-mediated screens facilitate functional dissection of non-coding sequences at single-base resolution

Bidirectional epigenetic editing reveals hierarchies in gene regulation

Precise measurement of molecular phenotypes with barcode-based CRISPRi systems

Higher-order combinatorial chromatin perturbations by engineered CRISPR-Cas12a for functional genomics

Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing

Genome-wide Mapping of Mutations at Single-Nucleotide Resolution for Protein, Metabolic and Genome Engineering

Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems

CRISPR gene and transcriptome engineering (CRISPRgate) improves loss-of-function genetic screening approaches

Joint genotypic and phenotypic outcome modeling improves base editing variant effect quantification

A Surrogate Reporter System for Multiplexable Evaluation of CRISPR/Cas9 in Targeted Mutagenesis

Engineered CRISPR-Cas12a for higher-order combinatorial chromatin perturbations

Long-read sequencing for fast and robust identification of correct genome-edited alleles: PCR-based and Cas9 capture methods

Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation

Functional Footprinting of Regulatory DNA

Massively Parallel CRISPR‐Based Genetic Perturbation Screening at Single‐Cell Resolution

Dissecting quantitative trait nucleotides by saturation genome editing

Double Nicking by RNA-Guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced Genome Editing Specificity

CRISPRmap: Sequencing-free optical pooled screens mapping multi-omic phenotypes in cells and tissue