New Eye Tracking Metrics System: The Value in Early Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Raymond Kong Wang,Kenneth Kwong,Kevin Liu,Xue-Jun Kong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.24312596
2024-08-28
Abstract:Background Eye tracking (ET) is emerging as a promising early and objective screening method for autism spectrum disorders (ASD), but it requires more reliable metrics with enhanced sensitivity and specificity for clinical use. Methods This study introduces a suite of novel ET metrics: Area of Interest (AOI) Switch Counts (ASC), Favorable AOI Shifts (FAS) along self-determined pathways, and AOI Vacancy Counts (AVC). These metrics were applied to toddlers and preschoolers diagnosed with ASD. The correlation between these new ET metrics and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) scores was assessed using linear regression. Sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off scores were also evaluated to predict diagnosis. Results Our findings indicate significantly lower FAS and ASC and higher AVC (P < 0.05) in children with ASD compared to their non-ASD counterparts within this high-risk cohort. There were no significant differences in total fixation time or pupil size (p > 0.05). Additionally, FAS was negatively correlated with ADOS-2 total scores and the social affect (SA) subscale (p < 0.05). Among these new ET metrics, AVC yielded the best sensitivity (88-100%) and specificity (80-88%) with a cut-off score of 0.305-0.306, followed by FAS and ASC for distinguishing ASD from non-ASD for diagnosis. Conclusions This study confirms the utility of innovative ET metrics FAS, AVC, and ASC, which exhibit markedly improved sensitivity and specificity, enhancing ASD screening and diagnostic processes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to address the limitations of existing methods in the early diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Specifically, the authors introduce a set of new eye-tracking (ET) metrics, including Area of Interest Switch Count (ASC), Fixation Area Shift (FAS), and Area of Interest Vacancy Count (AVC), to improve the sensitivity and specificity of ASD screening and diagnosis. ### Background Currently, the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder primarily relies on standard tools such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2). However, these traditional methods are often complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, leading to delays in diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, especially in underserved populations. Additionally, there are significant differences in the age of diagnosis among children from different racial and linguistic backgrounds, further emphasizing the urgent need to develop more effective and earlier detection tools. ### Research Methods 1. **Participants**: The study involved 39 high-risk children aged 18 to 84 months, who were considered by clinicians or guardians to potentially have ASD. 2. **Assessment Tools**: Data were collected using the Tobii X3-120 eye-tracking device, and diagnostic assessments were conducted using ADOS-2. 3. **Stimulus Materials**: Two videos, one testing joint attention ability and the other testing social communication and early language development cues. 4. **Data Analysis**: The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare TGC, ASC, FAS, and AVC between the ASD and non-ASD groups, and linear regression was used to analyze the correlation of these new metrics with ADOS-2 total scores and subscale scores. ### Results 1. **Performance of New Metrics**: The FAS and ASC of the ASD group were significantly lower than those of the non-ASD group, while the AVC was significantly higher in the ASD group. 2. **Correlation with ADOS-2**: FAS was negatively correlated with ADOS-2 total scores and the Social Affect (SA) subscale scores. 3. **Sensitivity and Specificity**: AVC demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between ASD and non-ASD, ranging from 88%-100% and 80%-88%, respectively. ### Conclusion This study confirms the effectiveness of the newly introduced eye-tracking metrics (FAS, AVC, and ASC) in improving the sensitivity and specificity of ASD screening and diagnosis. These new metrics are expected to become important tools for the early diagnosis of ASD, facilitating earlier intervention and improving long-term outcomes for patients.