Spatiotemporal Trends of Birth Defects in North Carolina, 2003-2015

Haidong Lu,Andrew F. Olshan,Marc L. Serre,Kurtis M. Anthony,Rebecca C. Fry,Nina E. Forestieri,Alexander P Keil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.12.24311873
2024-08-13
Abstract:Birth defects are a leading cause of infant mortality in the United States, but little is known about causes of many types of birth defects. Spatiotemporal disease mapping to identify high-prevalence areas, is a potential strategy to narrow the search for potential environmental and other causes that aggregate over space and time. We described the spatial and temporal trends of the prevalence of birth defects in North Carolina during 2003-2015, using data on live births obtained from the North Carolina Birth Defects Monitoring Program. By employing a Bayesian space-time Poisson model, we estimated spatial and temporal trends of non-chromosomal and chromosomal birth defects. During 2003-2015, 52,524 (3.3%) of 1,598,807 live births had at least one recorded birth defect. The prevalence of non-chromosomal birth defects decreased from 3.8% in 2003 to 2.9% in 2015. Spatial modeling suggested a large geographic variation in non-chromosomal birth defects at census-tract level, with the highest prevalence in south-eastern North Carolina. The strong spatial heterogeneity revealed in this work allowed to identify geographic areas with higher prevalence of non-chromosomal birth defects in North Carolina. This variation will help inform future research focused on epidemiologic studies of birth defects to identify etiologic factors.
Epidemiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is to describe the spatial and temporal trends of birth defects in North Carolina from 2003 to 2015 and to identify high-incidence areas. Specifically, the authors aim to analyze the data to: 1. **Describe the overall spatial and temporal trends of birth defects**: Understand the changes in birth defect incidence rates in different regions of North Carolina during this period. 2. **Assess deviations from statewide trends**: Identify areas where the birth defect incidence rates are significantly higher or lower than the statewide average at specific times and locations. Through these analyses, the researchers hope to better understand the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of birth defects, thereby providing clues for future epidemiological studies, particularly in identifying environmental and other factors that may lead to birth defects. This will help identify high-risk populations and areas, providing direction for further research.