Abstract:Background: Determining the role of fomites in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is essential in the hospital setting and will likely be important outside of medical facilities as governments around the world make plans to ease COVID-19 public health restrictions and attempt to safely reopen economies. Expanding COVID-19 testing to include environmental surfaces would ideally be performed with inexpensive swabs that could be transported safely without concern of being a source of new infections. However, CDC-approved clinical-grade sampling supplies and techniques using a synthetic swab are expensive, potentially expose laboratory workers to viable virus and prohibit analysis of the microbiome due to the presence of antibiotics in viral transport media (VTM). To this end, we performed a series of experiments comparing the diagnostic yield using five consumer-grade swabs (including plastic and wood shafts and various head materials including cotton, synthetic, and foam) and one clinical-grade swab for inhibition to RNA. For three of these swabs, we evaluated performance to detect SARS-CoV-2 in twenty intensive care unit (ICU) hospital rooms of patients including COVID-19+ patients. All swabs were placed in 95% ethanol and further evaluated in terms of RNase activity. SARS-CoV-2 was measured both directly from the swab and from the swab eluent. Results: Compared to samples collected in VTM, 95% ethanol demonstrated significant inhibition properties against RNases. When extracting directly from the swab head as opposed to the eluent, RNA recovery was approximately 2-4× higher from all six swab types tested as compared to the clinical standard of testing the eluent from a CDC-approved synthetic (SYN) swab. The limit of detection (LoD) of SARS-CoV-2 from floor samples collected using the consumer-grade plastic (CGp) or research-grade plastic The Microsetta Initiative (TMI) swabs was similar or better than the SYN swab, further suggesting that swab type does not impact RNA recovery as measured by the abundance of SARS-CoV-2. The LoD for TMI was between 0 and 362.5 viral particles, while SYN and CGp were both between 725 and 1450 particles. Lastly microbiome analyses (16S rRNA gene sequencing) of paired samples (nasal and floor from same patient room) collected using different swab types in triplicate indicated that microbial communities were not impacted by swab type, but instead driven by the patient and sample type. Conclusions: Compared to using a clinical-grade synthetic swab, detection of SARS-CoV-2 from environmental samples collected from ICU rooms of patients with COVID was similar using consumer-grade swabs, stored in 95% ethanol. The yield was best from the swab head rather than the eluent and the low level of RNase activity and lack of antibiotics in these samples makes it possible to perform concomitant microbiome analyses. Video abstract.

Validation of rectal swabbing for total and aerobic gut microbiota study

Comparison of Fecal Sample Collection Methods for Microbial Analysis Embedded within Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs

Comparison of shipping versus immediate freezer storage of vaginal samples for vaginal microbiota assessment

3D printed rectal swabs for assessing the gut microbiome, metabolome and inflammation

Assessing the impact of storage time on the stability of stool microbiota richness, diversity, and composition

An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing

Impact of Preservation Method and 16S Rrna Hypervariable Region on Gut Microbiota Profiling.

Fecal samples and rectal swabs adequately reflect the human colonic luminal microbiota

Evaluation of Bacterial Viability for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Impact of Thawing Temperature and Storage Time

Impact of Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation, Sample Storage and Sampling Fraction on Human Stool Microbial Community Profiles.

From-Toilet-to-Freezer: A Review on Requirements for an Automatic Protocol to Collect and Store Human Fecal Samples for Research Purposes

Effect of Stool Sampling on a Routine Clinical Method for the Quantification of Six Short Chain Fatty Acids in Stool Using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Variations of Gut Microbiome Profile under Different Storage Conditions and Preservation Periods: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation

Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles

16S Based Microbiome Analysis from Healthy Subjects' Skin Swabs Stored for Different Storage Periods Reveal Phylum to Genus Level Changes

Effect of cryopreservation medium conditions on growth and isolation of gut anaerobes from human faecal samples

Comparative analysis of the postadmission and antemortem oropharyngeal and rectal swab microbiota of ICU patients

Feasibility of using alternative swabs and storage solutions for paired SARS-CoV-2 detection and microbiome analysis in the hospital environment

Domestic freezer storage: a solution for preserving stool microbiota integrity for at-home collection

On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, rectal swab and mucosal tissue samples

The potential of residual clinical Group B Streptococcus swabs for assessing the vaginorectal microbiome in late pregnancy