Abstract:Microbiome studies are becoming larger in size to detect the potentially small effect that environmental factors have on our gut microbiomes, or that the microbiome has on our health. Therefore, fast and reproducible DNA isolation methods are needed to handle thousands of fecal samples. We used the Chemagic 360 chemistry and Magnetic Separation Module I (MSMI) instrument to compare two sample preservatives and four different pre-treatment protocols to find an optimal method for DNA isolation from thousands of fecal samples. The pre-treatments included bead beating, sample handling in tube and plate format, and proteinase K incubation. The optimal method offers a sufficient yield of high-quality DNA without contamination. Three human fecal samples (adult, senior, and infant) with technical replicates were extracted. The extraction included negative controls (OMNIgeneGUT, DNA/RNA shield fluid, and Chemagic Lysis Buffer 1) to detect cross-contamination and ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard as a positive control to mimic the human gut microbiome and assess sensitivity of the extraction method. All samples were extracted using Chemagic DNA Stool 200 H96 kit (PerkinElmer, Finland). The samples were collected in two preservatives, OMNIgeneGUT and DNA/RNA shield fluid. DNA quantity was measured using Qubit-fluorometer, DNA purity and quality using gel electrophoresis, and taxonomic signatures with 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing with V3V4 and V4 regions. Bead beating increased bacterial diversity. The largest increase was detected in gram-positive genera Blautia, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus. Preservatives showed minor differences in bacterial abundances. The profiles between the V3V4 and V4 regions differed considerably with lower diversity samples. Negative controls showed signs from genera abundant in fecal samples. Technical replicates of the Gut Standard and stool samples showed low variation. The selected isolation protocol included recommended steps from manufacturer as well as bead beating. Bead beating was found to be necessary to detect hard-to-lyse bacteria. The protocol was reproducible in terms of DNA yield among different stool replicates and the ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard. The MSM1 instrument and pre-treatment in a 96-format offered the possibility of automation and handling of large sample collections. Both preservatives were feasible in terms of sample handling and had low variation in taxonomic signatures. The 16S rRNA target region had a high impact on the composition of the bacterial profile. Importance: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a widely used method for determining the composition of the gut microbiota. Due to the differences in the gut microbiota composition between individuals, microbiome studies have expanded into large population studies to maximize detection of small effects on microbe-host interactions. Thus, the demand for a rapid and reliable microbial profiling is continuously increasing, making the optimization of high-throughput 96-format DNA extraction integral for NGS-based downstream applications. However, experimental protocols are prone to bias and errors from sample collection and storage, to DNA extraction, primer selection and sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses. Methodological bias can contribute to differences in microbiome profiles, causing variability across studies and laboratories using different protocols. To improve consistency and confidence of the measurements, the standardization of microbiome analysis methods has been recognized in many fields.

Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles

Preservation of the fecal samples at ambient temperature for microbiota analysis with a cost-effective and reliable stabilizer EffcGut

Impact of Preservation Method and 16S Rrna Hypervariable Region on Gut Microbiota Profiling.

Domestic freezer storage: a solution for preserving stool microbiota integrity for at-home collection

Effectiveness of stabilization methods for the immediate and short-term preservation of bovine fecal and upper respiratory tract genomic DNA

Assessing the impact of storage time on the stability of stool microbiota richness, diversity, and composition

A comparative analysis of preservation techniques for the optimal molecular detection of hookworm DNA in a human fecal specimen

A Study on the Storage Conditions of Stool DNA Samples in the Early Stage of Non-invasive Molecular Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer

Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile

An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing

Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation

An Effective Method for Isolation of DNA from Pig Faeces and Comparison of Five Different Methods.

Influence of fecal collection conditions and 16S rRNA gene sequencing at two centers on human gut microbiota analysis

The maintenance of microbial community in human fecal samples by a cost effective preservation buffer

Effect of storage and DNA extraction method on 16S rRNA-profiled fecal microbiota in Japanese adults

Comparison of shipping versus immediate freezer storage of vaginal samples for vaginal microbiota assessment

Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies

Molecular diagnostics of Salmonella and Campylobacter in human/animal fecal samples remain feasible after long-term sample storage without specific requirements

High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies

Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes

Effect of cryopreservation medium conditions on growth and isolation of gut anaerobes from human faecal samples