Relative fire-proneness of land cover types in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Bruno FCB Adorno,Augusto AJ Piratelli,Erica Hasui,Milton C Ribeiro,Pedro G Vaz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.21.604452
2024-10-26
Abstract:Fires are increasingly affecting tropical biomes, where landscape-fire interactions remain understudied. We investigate the fire-proneness (the likelihood of a land use or land cover (LULC) type burning more or less than expected based on availability) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (AF). This biodiversity hotspot is increasingly affected by fires due to human activities and climate change. Using a selection ratio-based approach, we analyzed fire-LULC interactions in 40,128 fires over a 35-year period (1987-2022) across various ecoregions in the AF. Our findings revealed that secondary forests, forest areas that have regrown after major disturbances, burned 61% more than expected by chance, whereas old-growth forests, native forests that have developed over very long periods, burned 57% less than expected, highlighting a nearly inverse relationship in their fire-proneness. Interestingly, our data indicate that pastures in the AF are less prone to fire than expected, despite being considered among the land uses that burn the most in Brazil. Other LULCs showed variable fire-proneness, with some differences between ecoregions. Over time, the fire-proneness of secondary forests decreased, likely due to forest aging and changes in land management practices. We emphasize the necessity for tailored fire management strategies that address the unique vulnerabilities of secondary forests, particularly in the context of ongoing restoration efforts aimed at increasing native forests. Effective measures, including the implementation of 'fire-smart management' practices and enhancing the perceived value of secondary forests among local communities, are crucial for mitigating fire risks. Integrating these strategies with incentive-based approaches can bolster fire prevention, ensuring the long-term success of restoration programs. Our study provides a framework for understanding fire-landscape dynamics in tropical forests and offers actionable insights for practitioners working to safeguard these biomes from the escalating threat of wildfires.
Ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore the fire - proneness of different Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) in the Atlantic Forest (AF) in Brazil. Specifically, the study attempts to answer the following questions: 1. **How is the fire - proneness of different land cover types?** - The study evaluated the fire - proneness of different land cover types in fires through the selection ratio method. The selection ratio is an indicator to measure whether the probability of a certain type of land cover being burned in a fire is proportional to its available area in the landscape. 2. **What are the differences in the fire - proneness between old - growth forests and secondary forests?** - The study pays special attention to the fire - proneness of old - growth forests and secondary forests, and these two forest types are of great significance in ecological restoration and protection. 3. **Are there differences in the fire - proneness of land cover types in different ecological regions?** - The study analyzed five major ecological regions (semi - deciduous seasonal forest, deciduous seasonal forest, humid evergreen forest, mixed humid forest and contact area) in the Atlantic Forest in Brazil and explored whether there are significant differences in fire - proneness within different ecological regions. 4. **Has the fire - proneness of secondary forests changed over time?** - The study also examined whether there is a trend in the fire - proneness of secondary forests from 1987 to 2022 (a period of 35 years), and the reasons for this change. ### Main findings - **Higher fire - proneness in secondary forests**: The fire - proneness of secondary forests is 61% higher than expected, while the fire - proneness of old - growth forests is 57% lower than expected. - **Lower - than - expected fire - proneness in pastures**: Although fires often occur in pastures, their fire - proneness is lower than expected. - **Differences in the fire - proneness of other land cover types**: There are significant differences in the fire - proneness of other land cover types (such as agricultural land, temporary crops, permanent crops, etc.) in different ecological regions. - **Decreasing fire - proneness of secondary forests over time**: Over time, the fire - proneness of secondary forests gradually decreases, which may be related to forest aging and changes in land management practices. ### Conclusions The study emphasizes the importance of formulating customized fire management strategies for secondary forests, especially in ongoing ecological restoration projects. Effective measures include implementing "smart fire management" practices and raising local communities' awareness of the value of secondary forests. The integration of these strategies combined with incentive mechanisms can enhance fire prevention and ensure the long - term success of ecological restoration projects.