The reliability and validity of a non-wearable indoor positioning system to assess mobility in older adults: A cross-sectional study

Isabel B. Rodrigues,Patricia Hewston,Jonathan Adachi,Sayem Borhan,George Ioannidis,Alexa Kouroukis,Carolyn Leckie,Andrea Lee,Alexander Rabinovich,Parthipan Siva,Rachel Swance,Suleman Tariq,Lehana Thabane,Alexandra Papaioannou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.04.24309984
2024-07-07
Abstract:Background: Chirp is a privacy-preserving radar sensor developed to continuously monitor older adults' safety and mobility without the need for cameras or wearable devices. Our study purpose was to evaluate the inter-sensor reliability, intrasession test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity of Chirp in a clinical setting. Methods: We recruited 35 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 75.5 (standard deviation: 6.6) years, 86% female). All participants lived alone in an urban city in southwestern Ontario and had access to a smart device with wireless internet. Data were collected with a 4-meter ProtoKinetics ZenoTM Walkway (pressure sensors) with the Chirp sensor (radar positioning) at the end of the walkway. Participants walked during normal and adaptive locomotion experimental conditions (walking-while-talking, obstacle, narrow walking, fast walking). Each of the experimental conditions was conducted twice in a randomized order, with fast walking trials performed last. For intra-session reliability testing, we conducted two blocks of walks within a participant session separated by approximately 30 minutes. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient(A,1) (ICC(A,1)) was used to assess the reliability and validity. Linear regression, adjusted for gender, was used to investigate the association between Chirp and cognition and health-related quality of life scores.  Results: The Chirp inter-sensor reliability ICC(A,1)=0.999[95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.997 to 0.999] and intrasession test-retest reliability [ICC(A,1) =0.921, 95% CI: 0.725 to 0.969] were excellent across all experimental conditions. Chirp concurrent validity compared to the ProtoKinetics ZenoTM Walkway was excellent across experimental conditions [ICC(A,1)= 0.993, 95% CI: 0.985 to 0.997]. We found a weak association between Chirp and cognition scores using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment across experimental conditions (estimated β-value= 7.79, 95% CI: 2.79 to 12.80) and no association between the Chirp and health-related quality of life using the 12-item Short Form Survey across experimental conditions (estimated β-value=6.12, 95% CI: -7.12 to 19.36). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that Chirp is a reliable and valid measure to assess gait parameters in clinics among older adults.
Geriatric Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to evaluate the reliability and effectiveness of a non-wearable indoor positioning system called Chirp in assessing the mobility of elderly people in a clinical setting. Chirp is a radar-based sensor that can continuously monitor the safety and mobility of the elderly without the need for cameras or wearable devices, thus protecting privacy. The study involved the recruitment of 35 community-dwelling elderly individuals (average age 75.5 years, standard deviation 6.6 years, 86% female) for the experiment, all of whom lived alone in a city in southwestern Ontario, Canada, and had smart devices with wireless network connections. Data collection was carried out using a combination of a 4-meter-long ProtoKinetics ZenoTM walkway (pressure sensor) and Chirp sensors (radar positioning) under normal walking and adaptive movement conditions (walking while talking, stepping over obstacles, narrow walking, and fast walking). Each condition was repeated twice in a random order, with the fast walking test conducted last. To test the repeatability within the same session, researchers conducted two sets of walking tests about 30 minutes apart. The study results showed that the Chirp sensor had excellent inter-sensor reliability (ICC (A,1) = 0.999, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.997 to 0.999) and repeatability within the same session (ICC (A,1) = 0.921, 95% CI: 0.725 to 0.969). Compared to the ProtoKinetics ZenoTM walkway, the concurrent validity of the Chirp sensor also performed well (ICC (A,1) = 0.993, 95% CI: 0.985 to 0.997). In addition, the study found a weak correlation between the Chirp sensor and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, but no correlation was found with the scores of the 12-item Short Form Survey related to health-related quality of life. In summary, the main goal of the paper is to demonstrate the reliability and effectiveness of the Chirp sensor in assessing gait parameters of the elderly in a clinical environment. The study results suggest that the Chirp sensor can effectively measure the gait parameters of the elderly with high reliability and validity, suitable for monitoring the gait of the elderly in a clinical setting. This may help in the early detection of gait changes, thereby predicting the risk of falls and decline in mobility, which is of significant importance for the independent living ability and health status of the elderly.