Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

Faster and more accurate assessment of differential transcript expression with Gibbs sampling and edgeR v4

edgeR v4: powerful differential analysis of sequencing data with expanded functionality and improved support for small counts and larger datasets

Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor

Degps is a Powerful Tool for Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequencing Studies

edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data

Experimental validation of methods for differential gene expression analysis and sample pooling in RNA-seq

Identifying differentially expressed transcripts from RNA-seq data with biological variation

Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation

Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights

Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for static and dynamic conditions

Differential analysis in Transcriptomic: The strength of randomly picking 'reference' genes

Assessment of batch-correction methods for scRNA-seq data with a new test metric

RNA-Skim: a Rapid Method for RNA-Seq Quantification at Transcript Level.

saseR: Juggling offsets unlocks RNA-seq tools for fast and Scalable differential usage, Aberrant Splicing and Expression Retrieval.

Bias, robustness and scalability in differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data

Benchmarking association analyses of continuous exposures with RNA-seq in observational studies

Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

FDM: a graph-based statistical method to detect differential transcription using RNA-seq data

BADER: Bayesian analysis of differential expression in RNA sequencing data

PennDiff: Detecting Differential Alternative Splicing and Transcription by RNA Sequencing.