Absence of Evidence is Not Evidence of Absence: The many flaws in the case against transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of pathogen avoidance in C. elegans

Rachel Kaletsky,Rebecca S Moore,Titas Sengupta,Renee Soto,Coleen Murphy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.07.597568
2024-06-07
Abstract:After examining the data and methods presented in Gainey, et al., bioRxiv, 2024 we conclude that the authors did not use an experimental paradigm that would have allowed them to replicate our results on transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TEI) of learned avoidance that we regularly observe. That is, we agree with the authors that their experiments show no evidence of TEI. However, there are substantial differences in their execution of every step of the work that also make it impossible for the authors to claim that they are replicating our experiments or protocols. Based on these differences, we do not believe there is an issue of robustness or reliability in our TEI findings, but rather that Hunter and colleagues have in fact not tested the central condition of TEI — that is, small RNA production by bacteria and subsequent uptake by C. elegans — nor have they carried out proper behavioral and imaging assays to assess this behavior. Our subsequent work shows that indeed this example of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is not just observed in laboratory settings with PA14, but is also induced by wild strains of Pseudomonas, exhibiting its robustness. Just as we offered advice and training to Hunter and colleagues, we are happy to advise anyone who wishes to learn this assay.
Genetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?