Abstract:Because the sophistication of tool use is vastly enhanced in humans compared with other species, a rich understanding of its neural substrates requires neuroscientific experiments in humans. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has enabled many studies of tool-related neural processing, surprisingly few studies have examined real tool use. Rather, because of the many constraints of fMRI, past research has typically used proxies such as pantomiming despite neuropsychological dissociations between pantomimed and real tool use. We compared univariate activation levels, multivariate activation patterns, and functional connectivity when participants used real tools (a plastic knife or fork) to act on a target object (scoring or poking a piece of putty) or pantomimed the same actions with similar movements and timing. During the Execute phase, we found higher activation for real versus pantomimed tool use in sensorimotor regions and the anterior supramarginal gyrus, and higher activation for pantomimed than real tool use in classic tool-selective areas. Although no regions showed significant differences in activation magnitude during the Plan phase, activation patterns differed between real versus pantomimed tool use and motor cortex showed differential functional connectivity. These results reflect important differences between real tool use, a closed-loop process constrained by real consequences, and pantomimed tool use, a symbolic gesture that requires conceptual knowledge of tools but with limited consequences. These results highlight the feasibility and added value of employing natural tool use tasks in functional imaging, inform neuropsychological dissociations, and advance our theoretical understanding of the neural substrates of natural tool use.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The study of tool use offers unique insights into how the human brain synthesizes perceptual, cognitive, and sensorimotor functions to accomplish a goal. We suggest that the reliance on proxies, such as pantomiming, for real tool use has (1) overestimated the contribution of cognitive networks, because of the indirect, symbolic nature of pantomiming; and (2) underestimated the contribution of sensorimotor networks necessary for predicting and monitoring the consequences of real interactions between hand, tool, and the target object. These results enhance our theoretical understanding of the full range of human tool functions and inform our understanding of neuropsychological dissociations between real and pantomimed tool use.

Tool use fine-tunes arm and tool maps

Somatotopic Reorganization of Hand Representation in Bilateral Arm Amputees with or Without Special Foot Movement Skill.

Extending tactile space with hand-held tools: A re-analysis and review

Different tool training induces specific effects on body metric representation

Perceptual Scale Expansion: A Natural Design for Improving the Precision of Motor Control.

Human Neuroimaging Reveals Differences in Activation and Connectivity Between Real and Pantomimed Tool Use.

Spatial Attention Affects the Processing of Tactile and Visual Stimuli Presented at the Tip of a Tool: an Event-Related Potential Study

A Somatosensory Computation That Unifies Limbs and Tools

Spatial tactile localization depends on sensorimotor binding: preliminary evidence from virtual reality

The White-Matter Structural Network Underlying Human Tool Use And Tool Understanding

Left anterior supramarginal gyrus activity during tool use action observation after extensive tool use training

The Influence of Tool Morphology on Visual Attention During the Interaction with Lower Palaeolithic Stone Tools

Differences in Neural Activation between Actual Tool Use and Pantomime: Evidence for Two Different Streams?

Visuo-proprioceptive recalibration and the sensorimotor map

Rescaling perceptual hand maps by visual‐tactile recalibration

Can Stochastic Resonance Improve Sensorimotor Performance in Hand Motor Control?

Behavioral performance and visual strategies during skill acquisition using a novel tool use motor learning task

Vibrotactile information improves proprioceptive reaching target localization

Spatial representations of objects used away and towards the body: The effect of near and far space

Robotic hand illusion with tactile feedback: Unravelling the relative contribution of visuotactile and visuomotor input to the representation of body parts in space

Distributed and convergent representations of tools in human parietal and anterior temporal regions revealed by fMRI-RSA