Abstract:Development is a highly complex process consisting of coordinated cell proliferation, cell differentiation and spatial organization. Classically, two ways to specify cell types during development are hypothesized : mosaic and regulative modes. In mosaic development, a particular cell isolated from the rest of the embryo will nevertheless give rise to cells with a fate identical to the ones expected in normal development, thus relying on lineage-inherited factors. In regulative development, the fate of a cell depends on its interactions with its environment, and thus relies on space-dependant factors. Both modes often coexist in the development of a given animal. We propose a method to quantify their respective contributions. C. elegans development provides a unique opportunity to elaborate such a measure. Indeed, its invariant lineage development allows to combine spatial positions, lineage relationships and protein expression data. Using the single cell protein expression profile as a readout of the cell state, we relate the contributions of the mosaic and the regulative modes to the following measurable quantities. The contribution of the mosaic mode, or lineage-inherited contribution is quantified by the strength of the relationship between the cell-cell lineage distance and the cell-cell expression distance. Similarly, the contribution of the regulative mode, or context-dependent contribution is quantified by the strength of the relationship between the cell-cell context distance and the cell-cell expression distance. The cell-cell context distance measures the similarity between the spatial neighborhoods of two cells based on the gene expression profiles of their neighbours. We assess the significance of these contributions by comparing the empirical results obtained on C. elegans data to artificial models generated using simple rules. With these measures, we show the co-existence of mosaic and regulative modes in the development of C. elegans. The relative contribution of these two modes varies across the different tissues and in time. In particular, we see in the skin tissue that during early development, the mosaic mode dominates while at later stages, regulative mode dominates, suggesting a convergence of single cell trajectories. These measures are general and can be applied to other datasets that will be made available with the progress of spatial transcriptomics and lineage-tracing, paving the way for a quantitative, unbiased and perturbation-free study of fundamental concepts in developmental biology.

The Molecular Basis of Differentiation Wave Activity in Embryogenesis

A cell state splitter and differentiation wave working-model for embryonic stem cell development and somatic cell epigenetic reprogramming.

Multidimensional Chromatin Regulation of Cell Lineage Differentiation in a Metazoan Embryo

Assessing the Relative Contributions of Mosaic and Regulatory Developmental Modes from Single-Cell Trajectories

Cell differentiation: what have we learned in 50 years?

Novel generic models for differentiating stem cells reveal oscillatory mechanisms

A mathematical framework for understanding the spontaneous emergence of complexity applicable to growing multicellular systems

Single‐cell Dynamics of Chromatin Activity During Cell Lineage Differentiation in Caenorhabditis Elegans Embryos

Quantitative Resolving Cell Fate in the Early Embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans

Microscopic Chromosomal Structural and Dynamical Origin of Cell Differentiation and Reprogramming

Hierarchical Symmetry-Breaking Model for Stem Cell Differentiation

From Genes to Patterns: A Framework for Modeling the Emergence of Embryonic Development from Transcriptional Regulation

A dynamic physical model of cell migration, differentiation and apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Tissue Morphogenesis: How Multiple Cells Cooperate to Generate a Tissue

A cell-based computational model of early embryogenesis coupling mechanical behaviour and gene regulation

Mathematical modeling for developmental processes

A Clock and Wavefront Self-Organizing Model Recreates the Dynamics of Mouse Somitogenesis in-vivo and in-vitro

Physical modeling of embryonic transcriptomes identifies collective modes of gene expression

Quantifying the Interplay Between Genetic and Epigenetic Regulations in Stem Cell Development

Dissecting the regulatory logic of specification and differentiation during vertebrate embryogenesis

Dynamic DNA Processing: A Microcode Model of Cell Differentiation