Cycling Cadence Selections at Different Saddle Heights Minimize Muscle Activation Rather Than Energy Cost

Cristian D. Riveros-Matthey,Mark J. Connick,Glen A. Lichtwark,Timothy J. Carroll

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.30.596596

2024-06-02

Abstract:Unlike walking and running, people do not consistently choose cadences that minimize energy consumption when cycling. Assuming a common objective function for all forms of locomotion, this suggests either that the neural control system relies on indirect sensorimotor cues to energetic cost that are approximately accurate during walking but not cycling, or that an alternative objective function applies that correlates with energy expenditure in walking but not cycling. This study compared how objective functions derived as proxies to 1) energy cost or 2) an avoidance of muscle fatigue predicted self-selected cycling cadences (SSC) at different saddle heights. Saddle height systematically affected SSC, with lower saddles increasing SSC and higher saddles decreasing SSC. Both fatigue-avoidance and energy-expenditure cost functions derived from muscle activation measurements showed minima that closely approximated the SSCs. By contrast, metabolic power derived from VO2 uptake was minimal at cadences well below the SSC across all saddle height variations. The mismatch between the cadence versus muscle activation and the cadence versus metabolic energy relations is likely due to additional energy costs associated with performing mechanical work at higher cadences. The results suggest that the nervous system places greater emphasis on muscle activation than on energy consumption for action selections in cycling.

Evolutionary Biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper primarily explores how the self-selected cadence (SSC) of cyclists is influenced by muscle activation and metabolic cost optimization criteria at different saddle heights.

Specifically, the study hypothesizes that cyclists will choose different cadences to cope with changes in saddle height, and that the cost function of avoiding fatigue will align with the self-selected cadence, regardless of saddle height variations. This suggests that during cycling, the nervous system may prioritize avoiding muscle fatigue or preventing exercise failure over minimizing energy expenditure in its action selection.