Abstract:Despite almost 50 years of research on the functional morphology and biomechanics of suction feeding, no consensus has emerged on how to characterize suction-feeding performance, or its morphological basis. We argue that this lack of unity in the literature is due to an unusually indirect and complex linkage between the muscle contractions that power suction feeding, the skeletal movements that underlie buccal expansion, the sharp drop in buccal suction pressure that occurs during expansion, the flow of water that enters the mouth to eliminate the pressure gradient, and the forces that are ultimately exerted on the prey by this flow. This complexity has led various researchers to focus individually on suction pressure, flow velocity, or the distance the prey moves as metrics of suction-feeding performance. We attempt to integrate a mechanistic view of the ability of fish to perform these components of suction feeding. We first discuss a model that successfully relates aspects of cranial morphology to the capacity to generate suction pressure in the buccal cavity. This model is a particularly valuable tool for studying the evolution of the feeding mechanism. Second, we illustrate the multidimensional nature of suction-feeding performance in a comparison of bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus, and largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, two species that represent opposite ends of the spectrum of performance in suction feeding. As anticipated, bluegills had greater accuracy, lower peak flux into the mouth, and higher flow velocity and acceleration of flow than did bass. While the differences between species in accuracy of strike and peak water flux were substantial, peak suction velocity and acceleration were only about 50% higher in bluegill, a relatively modest difference. However, a hydrodynamic model of the forces that suction feeders exert on their prey shows that this difference in velocity is amplified by a positive effect of the smaller mouth aperture of bluegill on force exerted on the prey. Our model indicates that the pressure gradient in front of a fish that is feeding by suction, associated with the gradient in water velocity, results in a force on the prey that is larger than drag or acceleration reaction. A smaller mouth aperture results in a steeper pressure gradient that exerts a greater force on the prey, even when other features of the suction flow are held constant. Our work shows that some aspects of suction-feeding performance can be determined from morphology, but that the complexity of the behavior requires a diversity of perspectives to be used in order to adequately characterize performance.

A novel feeding mechanism: Sunbirds drink nectar via intralingual suction

Variable evidence for convergence in morphology and function across avian nectarivores

Upper bill bending as an adaptation for nectar feeding in hummingbirds

Nectar Feeding by a Honey Bee's Hairy Tongue: Morphology, Dynamics, and Energy-Saving Strategies

Feeding Kinematics and Nectar Intake of the Honey Bee Tongue

Honey bees switch mechanisms to drink deep nectar efficiently

Sucking or Lapping: Facultative Feeding Mechanisms in Honeybees (apis Mellifera).

Temporal Model of Fluid-Feeding Mechanisms in a Long Proboscid Orchid Bee Compared to the Short Proboscid Honey Bee

Drinking Made Easier: Honey Bee Tongues Dip Faster into Warmer And/or Less Viscous Artificial Nectar

Nectar-feeding Bats and Birds Show Parallel Molecular Adaptations in Sugar Metabolism Enzymes.

Observations and Temporal Model of a Honeybee's Hairy Tongue in Microfluid Transport

Nectar mimicry: a new phenomenon

How to Dip Nectar: Optimal Time Apportionment in Natural Viscous Fluid Transport

How honey bees dip nectar: Dynamic spacing of tongue hairs facilitates to collect nectar of various viscosities

On the occurrence of frugivorous behavior by hummingbirds across the Americas

Three-dimensional movement of the beak during seed processing in domestic canaries

Feeding Behavior of Honey Bees on Dry Sugar.

Convergent and lineage-specific genomic changes contribute to adaptations in sugar-consuming birds

Suction feeding mechanics, performance, and diversity in fishes

The Morphology and Reciprocation Movement of Honeybee’s Hairy Tongue for Nectar Uptake

Bat–flower trait matching: Extreme phenotypic specialization affects diet preferences but not diet breadth