Abstract:The honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) tongue is a sophisticated and dexterous probing device that can bend and twist, adapting to various surfaces for liquid imbibition and/or gustatory sensing. The tongue exhibits remarkable extendibility, flexibility, and durability, which may be essentially ascribed to the internal elastic rod that supports the entire tongue. However, neither the material composition nor the structural features of the rod, especially a peculiar inner canal that facilitates feeding, have been studied in relation to their function. Herein, by combining a set of imaging techniques, including optical microscopy, high-speed videography, scanning electron microscopy, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and confocal laser scanning microscopy, we characterize the spatial morphology, surface wettability and material composition of honey bee tongue rods. By performing mechanical testing, including atomic force microscopy, fracture testing, and finite element analysis, we provide the first evidence that the internal canal of the rod may represent a specialized structure for water retention due to the specific chemistry of resilin, which is an elastomeric protein that dominates the entire rod and renders it highly elastic, compliant and robust. Numerical simulations also suggest that the opening of the canal may facilitate larger deformations in twisting, extending the flexibility of the rod. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The honey bee is one of the most important pollinators around the world and is capable of foraging a wide spectrum of liquid sources by dipping into them with a miniature hairy tongue. However, there are no direct muscles distributed inside the tongue, instead, there is a conspicuous elastic rod with a hollow core. The rod extends for its full length and, according to our study, structurally reinforces the entire tongue to achieve functional versatility, and suggests a water containing function of the rod canal for maintaining the elasticity of the protein (resilin) that constitutes the rod. Our results broaden understandings of the relationship among morphology, materials science, and function of a honey bee tongue.

Observations and Temporal Model of a Honeybee's Hairy Tongue in Microfluid Transport

Feeding Kinematics and Nectar Intake of the Honey Bee Tongue

The Morphology and Reciprocation Movement of Honeybee’s Hairy Tongue for Nectar Uptake

How to Dip Nectar: Optimal Time Apportionment in Natural Viscous Fluid Transport

Temporal Model of Fluid-Feeding Mechanisms in a Long Proboscid Orchid Bee Compared to the Short Proboscid Honey Bee

Erection Pattern and Section-Wise Wettability of Honeybee Glossal Hairs in Nectar Feeding.

Effects Of Erectable Glossal Hairs On A Honeybee'S Nectar-Drinking Strategy

Switchable Wettability of the Honeybee's Tongue Surface Regulated by Erectable Glossal Hairs.

Erection Mechanism of Glossal Hairs During Honeybee Feeding.

Enhanced Flexibility of the Segmented Honey Bee Tongue with Hydrophobic Tongue Hairs

Functional Compensation in a Honey Bee's Damaged Tongue While Dipping Nectar

Drag Reduction in the Mouthpart of A Honeybee Facilitated by Galea Ridges for Nectar-Dipping Strategy

The Honeybee's Protrusible Glossa is a Compliant Mechanism

Energy Saving Strategies of Honeybees in Dipping Nectar

Drag Reduction in a Natural High-Frequency Swinging Micro-Articulation: Mouthparts of the Honey Bee.

Hydrophilic and opened canals in honey bee tongue rods endow elastic structures with multiple functions

Drinking Made Easier: Honey Bee Tongues Dip Faster into Warmer And/or Less Viscous Artificial Nectar

Drag Reduction Effects Facilitated by Microridges Inside the Mouthparts of Honeybee Workers and Drones.

Divergence in Time Apportionments of Tongue Protraction and Retraction Phases for Feeding Honey Bee Drones and Workers

A Quick Tongue: Older Honey Bees Dip Nectar Faster to Compensate for Mouthpart Structure Deterioration.

Honey bees switch mechanisms to drink deep nectar efficiently