Abstract:Background: Social insects vary widely in social organization, yet the genetical and ecological factors influencing this variation remain poorly known. In particular, whether spatially varying selection influences the maintenance of social polymorphisms in ants has been rarely investigated. To fill this gap, we examined whether fine-scale habitat heterogeneity contributes to the co-existence of alternative forms of social organization within populations. Single-queen colonies (monogyne social form) are generally associated with better colonization abilities, whereas multiple-queen colonies (polygyne social form) are predicted to be better competitors and monopolize saturated habitats. We hypothesize that each social form colonizes and thrives in distinct local habitats, as a result of their alternative dispersal and colony founding strategies. Here, we test this hypothesis in the Alpine silver ant, in which a supergene controls polymorphic social organization. Results: Monogyne and polygyne colonies predominate in distinct habitats of the same population. The analysis of 59 sampling plots distributed across six habitats revealed that single-queen colonies mostly occupy unconnected habitats that were most likely reached by flight. This includes young habitats isolated by water and old habitats isolated by vegetation. In contrast, multiple-queen colonies were abundant in young, continuous and saturated habitats. Hence, alternative social forms colonize and monopolize distinct niches at a very local scale. Conclusions: Alternative social forms colonized and monopolized different local habitats, in accordance with differences in colonization and competition abilities. The monogyne social form displays a colonizer phenotype, by efficiently occupying empty habitats, while the polygyne social form exhibits a competitor phenotype, thriving in saturated habitats. The combination of the two phenotypes, coupled with fine-scale habitat heterogeneity, may allow the coexistence of alternative social forms within populations. Overall, these results suggest that spatially varying selection may be one of the mechanisms contributing to the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms in social organization.

The impact of social complexity on the efficacy of natural selection in termites

Pervasive relaxed selection in termite genomes

Reduced regulatory complexity associated with the evolutionary transition to sociality from cockroaches to termites despite evolutionary parallels with Hymenoptera

A Genomic Comparison of Two Termites with Different Social Complexity.

The diversity of social complexity in termites

Diversifying evolution of endo-beta-1,4-glucanase in termites (Isoptera)

Molecular Traces of Alternative Social Organization in a Termite Genome.

Hemimetabolous genomes reveal molecular basis of termite eusociality

Evidence for Reduced Immune Gene Diversity and Activity During the Evolution of Termites

Unexpectedly low recombination rates and presence of hotspots in termite genomes

Resource adaptation drives the size–complexity rule in termites

Transcriptomic and Functional Analyses of Phenotypic Plasticity in a Higher Termite, Macrotermes Barneyi Light

Major changes in domain arrangements are associated with the evolution of termites

The Molecular Substrates of Insect Eusociality

Risk management of solitary and eusocial reproduction

Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of the subterranean termite Reticulitermes speratus: Gene duplication facilitates social evolution

Inter-clonal competition over queen succession imposes a cost of parthenogenesis on termite colonies

A genetic toolkit underlying the queen phenotype in termites with totipotent workers

Natural selection drives the evolution of ant life cycles

Fine-scale habitat heterogeneity favours the coexistence of supergene-controlled social forms in Formica selysi