Abstract:Background: Social insects vary widely in social organization, yet the genetical and ecological factors influencing this variation remain poorly known. In particular, whether spatially varying selection influences the maintenance of social polymorphisms in ants has been rarely investigated. To fill this gap, we examined whether fine-scale habitat heterogeneity contributes to the co-existence of alternative forms of social organization within populations. Single-queen colonies (monogyne social form) are generally associated with better colonization abilities, whereas multiple-queen colonies (polygyne social form) are predicted to be better competitors and monopolize saturated habitats. We hypothesize that each social form colonizes and thrives in distinct local habitats, as a result of their alternative dispersal and colony founding strategies. Here, we test this hypothesis in the Alpine silver ant, in which a supergene controls polymorphic social organization. Results: Monogyne and polygyne colonies predominate in distinct habitats of the same population. The analysis of 59 sampling plots distributed across six habitats revealed that single-queen colonies mostly occupy unconnected habitats that were most likely reached by flight. This includes young habitats isolated by water and old habitats isolated by vegetation. In contrast, multiple-queen colonies were abundant in young, continuous and saturated habitats. Hence, alternative social forms colonize and monopolize distinct niches at a very local scale. Conclusions: Alternative social forms colonized and monopolized different local habitats, in accordance with differences in colonization and competition abilities. The monogyne social form displays a colonizer phenotype, by efficiently occupying empty habitats, while the polygyne social form exhibits a competitor phenotype, thriving in saturated habitats. The combination of the two phenotypes, coupled with fine-scale habitat heterogeneity, may allow the coexistence of alternative social forms within populations. Overall, these results suggest that spatially varying selection may be one of the mechanisms contributing to the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms in social organization.

Risk management of solitary and eusocial reproduction

The evolution of queen control over worker reproduction in the social Hymenoptera

The impact of social complexity on the efficacy of natural selection in termites

Unexpected worker mating and colony-founding in a superorganism

Colony and Evolutionary Dynamics of a Two‐stage Model with Brood Cannibalism and Division of Labor in Social Insects

Mate Success Affects Sex Ratio Strategies in Structured Population

Reproductive Dominance Strategies in Insect Social Parasites

Spider colony extinction does not depend on degree of sociality and maternal size in three Anelosimus species (Araneae, Theridiidae)

A mathematical analysis of the evolutionary benefits of sexual reproduction

Collective decision-making during reproduction in social insects: a conceptual model for queen supersedure in honey bees (Apis mellifera)

Towards Eusociality Using an Inverse Agent Based Model

Nutritional regulation influencing colony dynamics and task allocations in social insect colonies

Fine-scale habitat heterogeneity favours the coexistence of supergene-controlled social forms in Formica selysi

Dynamics of Coexistence of Asexual and Sexual Reproduction in Adaptive Landscape

The Molecular Substrates of Insect Eusociality

SolBeePopecotox: A Population Model for Pesticide Risk Assessments of Solitary Bees

A supergene-controlling social structure in Alpine ants also affects the dispersal ability and fecundity of each sex

Maternal manipulation of offspring size can trigger the evolution of eusociality in promiscuous species

Social Apoptosis in Honey Bee Superorganisms

Phenomenon of reproductive plasticity in ants