Using rapid invisible frequency tagging (RIFT) to probe the attentional distribution between speech planning and comprehension

Cecília Hustá,Antje Meyer,Linda Drijvers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.17.589897
2024-04-17
Abstract:Interlocutors often use the semantics of comprehended speech to inform the semantics of planned speech. Do representations of the comprehension and planning stimuli interact on a neural level? We used rapid invisible frequency tagging (RIFT) and EEG to probe the attentional distribution between spoken distractor words and target pictures in the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm. We presented participants with auditory distractor nouns (auditory (f1); tagged at 54Hz) together with categorically related or unrelated pictures (visual (f2); tagged at 68Hz), which had to be named after a delay. RIFT elicits steady-state evoked potentials, which reflect attentional allocation to the tagged stimuli. When representations of the tagged stimuli interact, integrative effects have been observed at the intermodulation frequency resulting from an interaction of the base frequencies (f2±f1; ). Our results showed clear power increases at 54Hz and 68Hz during the tagging window, but no differences between related or unrelated conditions. More interestingly, we observed a larger power difference in the unrelated compared to the related condition at the intermodulation frequency (68Hz – 54Hz: 14Hz), indicating stronger interaction between the auditory and visual representations when they were unrelated. Our results go beyond standard PWI results (e.g., ) by showing that participants do not have more difficulty visually attending to the related pictures or inhibiting the related auditory distractors. Instead, processing difficulties arise when the representations of the stimuli interact, meaning that participants might be trying to prevent integration between the auditory and visual representations in the related condition.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?