In search of a conditioned place preference test to assess the severity of experimental procedures

Anne Jaap,Pia Kahnau,Lars Lewejohann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.11.589117
2024-04-18
Abstract:To compare the severity of experimental procedures and behavioural tests from an animal’s perspective novel methods are needed. In theory, one feasible approach could be the use of a conditioned place preference test (CPP). In this test the preference for a certain area in a test apparatus is associated with an experimental treatment. Traditionally, the CPP is used to investigate, for example, the effects of drugs. Here, we wanted to develop a protocol, which instead would enable us to compare the effects of different experimental procedures conducted with mice. Nine experiments with C57BL/6J mice were performed, varying the setup, the procedure duration, the neutral to be conditioned stimuli (NS CS; visual and/or textual), and the unconditioned stimuli (US; fixation, food reward, or weighing) as well as the presentation order (NS before, after, or parallel to US). Unfortunately, none of the tested protocol resulted in a distinct preference. Moreover, even simple protocols using food reward as a treatment failed to result in a conditioned place preference. Overall, none of the protocols was sufficient to form a reliable association between NS and US. We have scrutinized the experimental setup in detail, and we cannot present a solution yet. However, hopefully, our findings will help to create a working CPP to compare the severity of different experimental procedures for mice.
Animal Behavior and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?