Cross‐species translational paradigms for assessing positive valence system as defined by the RDoC matrix
Tyler D. Dexter,Benjamin Z. Roberts,Samantha M. Ayoub,Michael Noback,Samuel A. Barnes,Jared W. Young
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16243
2024-10-29
Journal of Neurochemistry
Abstract:This work reviews cross‐species paradigms with validity for testing positive valence systems used in clinical populations, identified by the National Institute for Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criterion (RDoC) initiative. Tests available for rats and mice are discussed, including whether they have evidence for face, predictive, or neurobiological validities. A focus is placed on touchscreen tests, but all operant tasks are included in the discussion, and future tests are recommended. Functions associated with processing reward‐related information are fundamental drivers of motivation, learning, and goal‐directed behavior. Such functions have been classified as the positive valence system under the Research Domain and Criteria (RDoC) criteria and are negatively impacted across a range of psychiatric disorders and mental illnesses. The positive valence system is composed of three comprehensive categories containing related but dissociable functions that are organized into either Reward Responsiveness, Reward Learning, or Reward Valuation. The presence of overlapping behavioral dysfunction across diagnostic mental disorders is in‐part what motivated the RDoC initiative, which emphasized that the study of mental illness focus on investigating relevant behavior and cognitive functions and their underlying mechanisms, rather than separating efforts on diagnostic categories (i.e., transdiagnostic). Moreover, the RDoC approach is well‐suited for preclinical neuroscience research, as the rise in genetic toolboxes and associated neurotechnologies enables researchers to probe specific cellular targets with high specificity. Thus, there is an opportunity to dissect whether behaviors and cognitive functions are supported by shared or distinct neural mechanisms. For preclinical research to effectively inform our understandings of human behavior however, the cognitive and behavioral paradigms should have predictive, neurobiological, and pharmacological predictive validity to the human test. Touchscreen‐based testing systems provide a further advantage for this endeavor enabling tasks to be presented to animals using the same media and task design as in humans. Here, we outline the primary categories of the positive valence system and review the work that has been done cross‐species to investigate the neurobiology and neurochemistry underlying reward‐related functioning. Additionally, we provide clinical tasks outlined by RDoC, along with validity and/or need for further validation for analogous rodent paradigms with a focus on implementing the touchscreen‐based cognitive testing systems.
biochemistry & molecular biology,neurosciences