The growth-driven penetration strategy of plant roots is mechanically more efficient than pushing

Yoni Koren,Alessia Perilli,Oren Tchaicheeyan,Ayelet Lesman,Yasmine Meroz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.16.585213

2024-03-17

Abstract:Plant roots are considered highly efficient soil explorers. As opposed to the push-driven penetration strategy commonly used by many digging organisms, roots penetrate by growing, adding new cells at the tip, and elongating over a well-defined growth zone. However, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanical aspects associated with root penetration is currently lacking. We perform penetration experiments following roots growing into an agar gel environment, and a needle of similar dimensions pushed into the same agar. We measure and compare the environmental deformations in both cases by following the displacement of fluorescent beads embedded within the gel, combining confocal microscopy and Digital Volume Correlation (DVC) analysis. We find that deformations are generally smaller for the growing roots. To better understand the mechanical differences between the two penetration strategies we develop a computational model informed by experiments. Simulations show that, compared to push-driven penetration, grow-driven penetration reduces frictional forces and mechanical work, with lower propagation of displacements in the surrounding medium. These findings shed light on the complex interaction of plant roots with their environment, providing a quantitative understanding based on a comparative approach.

Biophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: whether the osmotic strategy driven by plant root growth is superior to the thrust - driven osmotic strategy in terms of mechanical efficiency. Specifically, the researchers hope to use experimental and computational simulation methods to compare and analyze the deformation effects on the surrounding medium and the energy consumption when the growth - driven plant roots (taking Arabidopsis thaliana as an example) and the thrust - driven needles penetrate into the same medium (such as agar gel), thereby revealing the mechanical mechanism by which plant roots efficiently explore the soil.

The research background points out that plant roots are considered to be efficient soil explorers. They penetrate the soil by continuously generating new cells and elongating at the root tips, and this process occurs within a well - defined growth zone. In contrast, many burrowing organisms adopt a thrust - driven osmotic strategy. Although the growth - driven osmotic method is considered more effective, the mechanical mechanism behind it has not been fully understood. Therefore, this study aims to quantitatively compare the differences in mechanical interactions between these two osmotic strategies through experimental observations and computational modeling, providing a quantitative understanding based on the comparative method.