Abstract:Natural visual stimuli are typically complex. This presents animals with the challenge of learning the most informative aspects of these stimuli while not being confused by variable elements. How animals might do this remains unclear. Here, we tested bumblebees’ ability to learn multicomponent visual stimuli composed of a simple constant bar element and a grating element that was consistent in orientation but varied in width and number of gratings. Bees rapidly and successfully learned these compound stimuli. Tests revealed learning of the single bar element was more robust than learning of the grating element. Our study highlights how even small-brained invertebrates can rapidly learn multicomponent stimuli and prioritise the most consistent elements within them. We discuss how the learning phenomena of generalisation and overshadowing may be sufficient to explain these findings, and caution that complex cognitive concepts are not necessary to explain the learning of complex stimuli.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How do bees learn and preferentially select the most consistent elements among complex visual stimuli?** Specifically, the researchers wanted to understand how bumblebees can quickly learn to recognize and remember the key features in these stimuli when faced with multi - component visual stimuli, without being interfered by other changing elements. ### Problem Background Visual stimuli in nature are usually complex. For example, flowers are different not only in color, size, structure and brightness, but also contain multiple visual information. This poses a challenge to animals: they need to learn to recognize the most informative parts of these complex stimuli without being confused by the changing elements. Although humans and computer vision algorithms can promote visual learning by recognizing simple elements, how animals process the learning process of complex visual stimuli is still unclear. ### Research Methods To explore this problem, the researchers designed an experiment in which bumblebees were made to learn composite visual stimuli consisting of two parts: 1. **Simple and constant part**: A horizontal or vertical bar. 2. **Complex and variable part**: A set of grids whose orientation is fixed but whose width and number vary in different trials. ### Research Purposes The main purpose of the research was to evaluate the performance of bees in learning these composite stimuli and to determine whether they could preferentially select and remember the most consistent elements. In addition, the research also explored two psychological mechanisms that might explain this selective learning phenomenon: **generalisation** and **overshadowing**. ### Main Findings - Bees can quickly and successfully learn these composite stimuli. - The test results show that bees' learning of single - bar elements is more robust than that of grid elements. - These findings indicate that even invertebrates with relatively small brains can quickly learn complex multi - component stimuli and preferentially select the most consistent elements among them. ### Conclusions The research results emphasize the adaptability of bees as extensive foragers, making them an ideal model for studying visual cognition. At the same time, the research shows that generalisation and overshadowing may be the key mechanisms to explain these findings, without relying on complex cognitive concepts to explain the learning process of complex stimuli. ### Formula Representation No specific mathematical formulas are involved in the article, but statistical methods such as the Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) and non - parametric statistical tests (Kruskal - Wallis test, Wilcoxon signed - rank test) are used in the description of experimental design and data analysis. The following is the Markdown - format representation of relevant formulas: - **Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM)**: \[ \text{response} \sim 1+\text{trials}+\text{beegroupHV}+\text{beegroup}+(1|\text{bee index}) \] - **Kruskal - Wallis Test**: \[ H_0: \text{There are no significant differences between groups} \] \[ H_a: \text{At least one group has a significant difference from the others} \] - **Wilcoxon Signed - Rank Test**: \[ H_0: \text{The median is zero} \] \[ H_a: \text{The median is not zero} \] These statistical methods help to verify the validity and reliability of the experimental results.

Bumblebee visual learning: simple solutions for complex stimuli

Bumblebees flexibly adjust learning and decision strategies to sensory information content in a foraging task

Behavioral state influences encoding mechanisms of color and odor integration in a model insect, the bumblebee Bombus impatiens

Flexible visual learning in nectar-foraging hornets

Bumble bees display cross-modal object recognition between visual and tactile senses

Learning modifies attention during bumblebee visual search

Stimulus intensity and temporal configuration interact during bimodal learning and memory in honey bees

Multimodal cues provide redundant information for bumblebees when the stimulus is visually salient, but facilitate red target detection in a naturalistic background

Bumblebee social learning outcomes correlate with their flower-facing behaviour

Visual learning in a virtual reality environment upregulates immediate early gene expression in the mushroom bodies of honey bees

Length of stimulus presentation and visual angle are critical for efficient visual PER conditioning in the restrained honey bee, Apis mellifera

The Role of Similarity of Stimuli and Responses in Learning by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees: A Test of Osgood’s Model

Different effects of reward value and saliency during bumblebee visual search for multiple rewarding targets

Cognitive components of color vision in honey bees: how conditioning variables modulate color learning and discrimination

Segregation of visual inputs from different regions of the compound eye in two parallel pathways through the anterior optic tubercle of the bumblebee (Bombus ignitus)

Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans

Honeybees learn odour mixtures via a selection of key odorants

Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities

Bumblebees increase their learning flight altitude in dense environments

Fruit flies can learn non-elemental olfactory discriminations

Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension?