Neurophysiological measures of covert semantic processing in neurotypical adolescents actively ignoring spoken sentence inputs: A high-density event-related potential (ERP) study

Kathryn K. Toffolo,Edward G. Freedman,John J. Foxe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.29.582736

2024-02-29

Abstract:Language comprehension requires semantic processing of individual words and their context within a sentence. Well-characterized event-related potential (ERP) components (the N400 and late positivity component (LPC/P600)) provide neuromarkers of semantic processing, and are robustly evoked when semantic errors are introduced into sentences. These measures are useful for evaluating semantic processing in clinical populations, but it is not known whether they can be evoked in more severe neurodevelopmental disorders where explicit attention to the sentence inputs cannot be objectively assessed (i.e., when sentences are passively listened to). We evaluated whether N400 and LPC/P600 could be detected in adolescents who were explicitly ignoring sentence inputs. Specifically, it was asked whether explicit attention to spoken inputs was required for semantic processing, or if a degree of automatic processing occurs when the focus of attention is directed elsewhere? High-density ERPs were acquired from twenty-two adolescents (7-12 years), under two experimental conditions: 1) individuals actively determined whether the final word in a sentence was congruent or incongruent with sentence context, or 2) passively listened to background sentences while watching a video. When sentences were ignored, N400 and LPC/P600 were robustly evoked to semantic errors, albeit with reduced amplitudes and protracted/delayed latencies. Statistically distinct topographic distributions during passive versus active paradigms pointed to distinct generator configurations for semantic processing as a function of attention. Covert semantic processing continues in neurotypical adolescents when explicit attention is withdrawn from sentence inputs. As such, this approach could be used to objectively investigate semantic processing in populations with communication deficits.

Neuroscience

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper primarily explores whether neurophysiological indicators of semantic processing (such as N400 and Late Positive Component LPC/P600) can still be detected when adolescents actively ignore spoken sentence inputs. Specifically, the study aims to address the following questions:

1. **Does semantic processing require explicit attention?**
- The researchers aim to understand whether semantic processing still occurs automatically when participants divert their attention elsewhere. In other words, is explicit attention a necessary condition for semantic processing?

2. **Can N400 and LPC/P600 be detected under passive listening conditions?**
- By using high-density event-related potential (ERP) recordings, the study investigates whether N400 and LPC/P600 components related to semantic errors can still be detected when adolescents actively ignore sentence inputs. The study also examines whether these components show reduced amplitude or delayed latency under passive listening conditions.

3. **What are the differences in semantic processing mechanisms under different attention conditions?**
- The study also explores whether there are significant differences in the neural generation mechanisms of semantic processing under active and passive task conditions. By comparing the scalp distribution maps under both conditions, the researchers aim to infer the different generation configurations of semantic processing under varying attention conditions.

### Research Background and Objectives

- **Background**: It is known that N400 and LPC/P600 components can be used to assess semantic processing abilities in clinical populations. However, it remains unclear whether these components are still effective in severe neurodevelopmental disorders where explicit attention cannot be objectively assessed.
- **Objective**: To develop a tool for objectively assessing semantic processing abilities in pediatric clinical populations with communication disorders. By comparing the ERP components of adolescents under active and passive task conditions, the study aims to verify the reliability and applicability of these components under passive conditions.