Abstract:Learning to make adaptive decisions involves making choices, assessing their consequence, and leveraging this assessment to attain higher rewarding states. Despite vast literature on value-based decision-making, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying decisions in highly uncertain contexts. Real world decisions are rarely accompanied by immediate feedback, explicit rewards, or complete knowledge of the environment. Being able to make informed decisions in such contexts requires significant knowledge about the environment, which can only be gained via exploration. Here we aim at understanding and formalizing the brain mechanisms underlying these processes. To this end, we first designed and performed an experimental task. Human participants had to learn to maximize reward while making sequences of decisions with only basic knowledge of the environment, and in the absence of explicit performance cues. Participants had to rely on their own internal assessment of performance to reveal a covert relationship between their choices and their subsequent consequences to find a strategy leading to the highest cumulative reward. Our results show that the participants' reaction times were longer whenever the decision involved a future consequence, suggesting greater introspection whenever a delayed value had to be considered. The learning time varied significantly across participants. Second, we formalized the neurocognitive processes underlying decision-making within this task, combining mean-field representations of competing neural populations with a reinforcement learning mechanism. This model provided a plausible characterization of the brain dynamics underlying these processes, and reproduced each aspect of the participants' behavior, from their reaction times and choices to their learning rates. In summary, both the experimental results and the model provide a principled explanation to how delayed value may be computed and incorporated into the neural dynamics of decision-making, and to how learning occurs in these uncertain scenarios.

Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision Making

Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision-Making

From Learning to Choosing: How Decision-Making Evolves with Experience in Rats

Extracting the dynamics of behavior in sensory decision-making experiments

A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions

Theoretical Behaviorism, Economic Theory, and Choice

Multiple timescales of learning indicated by changes in evidence-accumulation processes during perceptual decision-making

Rats and Humans Can Optimally Accumulate Evidence for Decision-Making

A new theoretical framework jointly explains behavioral and neural variability across subjects performing flexible decision-making

Tracking subjects’ strategies in behavioural choice experiments at trial resolution

Cognitive mechanisms of learning in sequential decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental and theoretical approach

Tracking subjects' strategies in behavioural choice experiments at trial resolution

Internal states emerge early during learning of a perceptual decision-making task

Affective and cognitive mechanisms of risky decision making

Training a Two-Choice Decision-Making Model with Environment Feedback.

Performance errors during rodent learning reflect a dynamic choice strategy

Learning Shapes the Representation of Behavioral Choice in the Human Brain

Decrease in decision noise from adolescence into adulthood mediates an increase in more sophisticated choice behaviors and performance gain

Ongoing, rational calibration of reward-driven perceptual biases

The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning

Behavioral Representation of Cost and Benefit Balance in Rats