0077 TITLE: Test Format Influences the Effectiveness of Wakeful Rest for Memory Consolidation
Daniel Gonsalez,Yordanos Knife,Omalys Biggs-Rodriguez,Favour Kowe,Carmen Westerberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0077
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction New memories are stabilized and strengthened during memory consolidation, which is facilitated during sleep. Recent research suggests that wakeful rest (WR), i,e., a period in which attention and other cognitive demands are reduced, May also facilitate memory consolidation. However other studies have failed to find such benefits of WR. Complicating matters, several methodological differences across successful and unsuccessful WR studies exist, including differences in learning material and test format. This experiment examined how test format may influence the effects of WR on memory consolidation. Methods Participants completed two consecutive sessions. In each session, they watched a 15-min video and then took an immediate memory test followed by a 15-min break while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. During the break, participants engaged in WR by sitting quietly in a comfortable chair in one session and completed a computer game distractor test in the other. Next, participants took a delayed memory test for the video and then completed a mind wandering questionnaire. For 16 participants, the memory test were multiple-choice and for 15 participants, the memory test were free recall. Results For participants who took multiple-choice test, let’s forgetting occururred from the immediate to the delayed memory test when participants engaged in WR compared to a distractor task during the break, and this difference was larger for participants who engaged in WR during the first session. For participants who took free recall test, although memory improved from the immediate to the delayed test during both sessions, there was no difference in size the improvement when participants engaged in WR compared to a distractor task during the break. Conclusion The efficacy of WR or memory consolidation depends on the format in which memory is tested. In the current experiment, WR during the break was more effective than a distractor task for preserving memories when tests were in multiple-choice but not free-call format. Additionally, when using a within-participants design, the order in which WR and the distractor task are completed is also relevant. EEG and mind-wandering data may be useful in understanding context in which WR may be most effective for memory consolidation. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology